Cited by 26Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Attending to Emotional Cues for Drug Abuse: Bridging the Gap Between Clinic and Home Behaviors

Open access
Otto, Michael, O'Cleirigh, Conall, Pollack, Mark·2007·Science & Practice Perspectives

Abstract

Classical conditioning models of addiction provide keys to understanding the vexing discrepancy between substance abuse patients' desire to abstain when they are in therapy sessions and their tendency to relapse. Experiments using these models demonstrate the power of environmental relapse cues and support clinical approaches, including active exposure, aimed at helping patients recognize and withstand them. Internal cues, including emotions and somatic states such as withdrawal, can trigger urges as powerfully as external cues such as people, places, and things associated with prior abuse. The authors describe a cognitive-behavioral therapy approach that focuses on identifying and actively inducing each patient's high-risk emotions, then helping him or her develop and practice healthy responses. Clinical trials support the approach for patients with panic disorder who have trouble discontinuing benzodiazepines, and early trials suggest it may be useful for patients addicted to other drugs as well.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1151/spp073248

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lowman C Allen J Stout RL 1996 Section II. Marlatt’s taxonomy of high-risk situations for relapse: Replication and extension Addiction 91 Suppl s51 s171 8997781

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otto, M., O'Cleirigh, C., & Pollack, M.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Otto, Michael
Venue
Science & Practice Perspectives
Published
2007-04
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
48-56
ISSN
  • 1930-4307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-4315
OpenAlex
W2086809234
Cited by
26
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science & Practice Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da010040-03)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA 10040, R01DA017904, R10DA009692)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
drug addiction, relapse, emotional cues, classical conditioning, cognitive behavioral therapy, withdrawal, addiction treatment, benzodiazepine discontinuation, panic disorder, craving
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Cues, Emotions, Humans, Recurrence, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review