Cited by 279Science Education and PedagogyScience and Education ResearchPhilosophy and History of Science

A physiologist's view of homeostasis

Open access
Modell, Harold, Cliff, William, Michael, Joel, McFarland, Jenny, Wenderoth, Mary Pat, Wright, Ann·2015·Advances in Physiology Education

Abstract

Homeostasis is a core concept necessary for understanding the many regulatory mechanisms in physiology. Claude Bernard originally proposed the concept of the constancy of the "milieu interieur," but his discussion was rather abstract. Walter Cannon introduced the term "homeostasis" and expanded Bernard's notion of "constancy" of the internal environment in an explicit and concrete way. In the 1960s, homeostatic regulatory mechanisms in physiology began to be described as discrete processes following the application of engineering control system analysis to physiological systems. Unfortunately, many undergraduate texts continue to highlight abstract aspects of the concept rather than emphasizing a general model that can be specifically and comprehensively applied to all homeostatic mechanisms. As a result, students and instructors alike often fail to develop a clear, concise model with which to think about such systems. In this article, we present a standard model for homeostatic mechanisms to be used at the undergraduate level. We discuss common sources of confusion ("sticky points") that arise from inconsistencies in vocabulary and illustrations found in popular undergraduate texts. Finally, we propose a simplified model and vocabulary set for helping undergraduate students build effective mental models of homeostatic regulation in physiological systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/advan.00107.2015

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Homeostatic control involves reflex-like actions driven by feedback and prediction error-the discrepancy between an expected bodily state (a homeostatic setpoint) and its actual level as signaled by sensory inputs from the body.

    “This control has long been known to involve reflex-like actions (comprising motor, endocrine, immunological, and autonomic processes) that are driven by feedback and the resulting “prediction error”—the discrepancy between an expected bodily state (a homeostatic setpoint2) and its actual level as signaled by sensory inputs from the body (Modell et al., 2015); see Figure 4.”

    From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Modell et al., 2015

    The generic homeostatic regulatory-system description (Fig. 1; page unavailable) says a sensor reports the actual value of a variable, an error detector compares it with a set point, and the resulting signal guides effectors. This supports the feedback-and-discrepancy part of the claim. The paper does not describe homeostatic control generally as reflex-like actions comprising motor, endocrine, immunological, and autonomic processes; its negative-feedback discussion notes that the muscle stretch reflex is not itself homeostatic. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Association of American Medical Colleges-Howard Hughes Medical Institute Committee. Scientific Foundations for Future Physicians. Report of the AAMC-HHMI Committee. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. [11]Houssay BA. Human Physiology (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1955. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Modell, H., Cliff, W., Michael, J., McFarland, J., Wenderoth, M. P., & Wright, A.
Affiliations
  • Physiology Educational Research Consortium (US)
  • Niagara University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Edmonds Community College (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Canisius College (US)
Corresponding author
Modell, Harold
Venue
Advances in Physiology Education
Published
2015-12
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
259-266
ISSN
  • 1043-4046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1229
OpenAlex
W2215310868
Cited by
279
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AJP Advances in Physiology Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF) (DUE-1043443)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
homeostasis, homeostatic regulation, Claude Bernard, milieu intérieur, Walter B. Cannon, control systems, feedback regulation, undergraduate physiology education, mental models, conceptual model
MeSH terms
Animals, Curriculum, Education, Professional, Homeostasis, Humans, Learning, Models, Biological, Terminology as Topic, Physiology, Teaching, Comprehension, Consensus, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review