Cited by 63Innovations in Medical EducationProblem and Project Based LearningBiomedical and Engineering Education

What makes the learning of physiology in a PBL medical curriculum challenging? Student perceptions

Tufts, Mark A., Higgins-Opitz, Susan B.·2009·Advances in Physiology Education

Abstract

Physiology is an integral component of any medical curriculum. Traditionally, the learning of physiology has relied heavily on systems-based didactic lectures. In 2001, the Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine (NRMSM; Durban, South Africa) embarked on a problem-based curriculum in which the learning of physiology was integrated with relevant clinical scenarios. Students are expected to gain an understanding of physiology through self-directed research with only certain aspects being covered in large-group resource sessions (LGRSs). It has gradually become evident that this approach has resulted in significant gaps in students' understanding of basic physiological concepts. A survey of student perceptions of needs for physiology was undertaken to gain a better understanding of their perceived problems and also to inform them of proposed curricular changes. Students were asked to what extent they thought physiology was essential for their understanding of pathology, interpretation of patients' clinical signs and presentation of symptoms, and analysis of laboratory results. Students were also invited to detail the difficulties they experienced in understanding in LGRSs on clinical and physiological topics. The results of the survey indicate that greater interaction of students with experts is needed. In particular, students felt that they lacked the basic conceptual foundations essential for the learning and understanding of physiology, since the difficulties that the students identified are mainly terminological and conceptual in nature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/advan.90214.2008

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tufts, M. A., & Higgins-Opitz, S. B.
Affiliations
University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Corresponding author
Tufts, Mark A.
Venue
Advances in Physiology Education
Published
2009-09
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
187-195
ISSN
  • 1043-4046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1229
OpenAlex
W2097933976
Cited by
63
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AJP Advances in Physiology Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biomedical and Engineering Education
Keywords
physiology education, problem-based learning, medical curriculum, student perceptions, conceptual difficulties, curriculum reform
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Education, Medical, Humans, Learning, Physiology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review