The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mitochondrial function in vivo evaluated by NADH fluorescence: from animal models to human studies
Abstract
Normal mitochondrial function is a critical factor in maintaining cellular homeostasis in various organs of the body. Due to the involvement of mitochondrial dysfunction in many pathological states, the real-time in vivo monitoring of the mitochondrial metabolic state is crucially important. This type of monitoring in animal models as well as in patients provides real-time data that can help interpret experimental results or optimize patient treatment. The goals of the present review are the following: 1) to provide an historical overview of NADH fluorescence monitoring and its physiological significance; 2) to present the solid scientific ground underlying NADH fluorescence measurements based on published materials; 3) to provide the reader with basic information on the methodologies used in the past and the current state of the art fluorometers; and 4) to clarify the various factors affecting monitored signals, including artifacts. The large numbers of publications by different groups testify to the valuable information gathered in various experimental conditions. The monitoring of NADH levels in the tissue provides the most important information on the metabolic state of the mitochondria in terms of energy production and intracellular oxygen levels. Although NADH signals are not calibrated in absolute units, their trend monitoring is important for the interpretation of physiological or pathological situations. To understand tissue function better, the multiparametric approach has been developed where NADH serves as the key parameter. The development of new light sources in UV and visible spectra has led to the development of small compact units applicable in clinical conditions for better diagnosis of patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intracellular Coenzymes as Natural Biomarkers for Metabolic Activities and Mitochondrial Anomalies
Heikal, A. A. (2010) · Biomarkers in Medicine · doi:10.2217/bmm.10.1 · Cited by 458
Optical Imaging Using Endogenous Contrast to Assess Metabolic State
Georgakoudi, I., & Quinn, K. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150108 · Cited by 316
Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Sensors for Intracellular NADH Detection
Zhao, Y., Jin, J., Hu, Q., Zhou, H.-M., Yi, J., Yu, Z., Xu, L., Wang, X., Yang, Y., & Loscalzo, J. (2011) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2011.09.004 · Cited by 302
Quantitative metabolic imaging using endogenous fluorescence to detect stem cell differentiation
Quinn, K. P., Sridharan, G. V., Hayden, R. S., Kaplan, D. L., Lee, K., & Georgakoudi, I. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep03432 · Cited by 278
Metabolic Profiling of Hypoxic Cells Revealed a Catabolic Signature Required for Cell Survival
Frezza, C., Zheng, L., Tennant, D. A., Papkovsky, D. B., Hedley, B. A., Kalna, G., Watson, D. G., & Gottlieb, E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024411 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayevsky, A., & Rogatsky, G. G.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 292
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- C615-C640
- ISSN
- 0363-6143 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1563
- OpenAlex
- W2160898122
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mitochondrial function in vivo evaluated by NADH fluorescence: from animal models to human studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpcell.00249.2006
- The paper
- Mayevsky, A., & Rogatsky, G. G. (2007). Mitochondrial function in vivo evaluated by NADH fluorescence: from animal models to human studies. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00249.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.