Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Short-term, mixed-diet overfeeding in man: no evidence for "luxuskonsumption"

Ravussin, E., Schutz, Y., Acheson, K. J., Dusmet, M., Bourquin, L., Jequier, E.·1985·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

After 13 days of weight maintenance diet (13,720 +/- 620 kJ/day, 40% fat, 15% protein, and 45% carbohydrate), five young men (71.3 +/- 7.1 kg, 181 +/- 8 cm; means +/- SD) were overfed for 9 days at 1.6 times their maintenance requirements (i.e., +8,010 kJ/day). Twenty-four-hour energy expenditure (24-h EE) and basal metabolic rate (BMR) were measured on three occasions, once after 10 days on the weight-maintenance diet and after 2 and 9 days of overfeeding. Physical activity was monitored throughout the study, body composition was measured by underwater weighing, and nitrogen balance was assessed for 3 days during the two experimental periods. Overfeeding caused an increase in body weight averaging 3.2 kg of which 56% was fat as measured by underwater weighing. After 9 days of overfeeding, BMR increased by 622 kJ/day, which could explain one-third of the increase in 24-h EE (2,038 kJ/day); the remainder was due to the thermic effect of food (which increased in proportion with excess energy intake) and the increased cost of physical activity, related to body weight gain. This study shows that approximately one-quarter of the excess energy intake was dissipated through an increase in EE, with 75% being stored in the body. Under our experimental conditions of mixed overfeeding in which body composition measurements were combined with those of energy balance, it was possible to account for all of the energy ingested in excess of maintenance requirements.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.1985.249.5.e470

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. APFELBAUM M., J., 1971, Am. J. Clin. Nub., 24, 1404
  2. DALLOSSO H. M., 1984, Invest., 73, 633, 10.1172/JCI111253 · DOI
  3. GARROW J. S, 1974, J. Nutr. North-Holland, 8
  4. 10.1079/BJN19840070 · DOI
  5. DANFORTH E., 1981, Pima Indians. Clin. Res., 29, 663A
  6. GARROW J. S, 1981, M. Cairella and A. N. Howard. London: John Libbey, 3, 208
  7. 10.1093/ajcn/30.7.1026 · DOI
  8. GULLICK A, 1922, Am. J. Physiol., 60, 371, 10.1152/ajplegacy.1922.60.2.371 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/ajcn/38.6.989 · DOI
  10. KATZEFF H. L., 1981, Clin. Res., 29, 663A
  11. MILLER D. S., 1967, J. STOCK. Gluttony. 2. Thermogenesis in overeating man. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 20, 1223
  12. 10.1093/ajcn/33.5.978 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/0026-0495(82)90178-0 · DOI
  14. 10.1079/BJN19550006 · DOI
  15. 10.1079/BJN19630040 · DOI
  16. 10.1079/BJN19770039 · DOI
  17. RAVUSSIN E., B., 1982, Nutr., 35, 566
  18. 10.1016/0026-0495(81)90082-2 · DOI
  19. ROTHWELL N., 1980, Proc. Nutr. Sot., 39, 5A
  20. 10.1152/jappl.1982.53.4.955 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/ajcn/40.3.542 · DOI
  22. SCHUTZ Y., E., 1982, Int. J. Obesity, 6, 23
  23. SIMS E. A., 1973, Rec. Progr. Horn. Res., 29, 457
  24. 10.1079/BJN19670090 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/ajcn/33.6.1299 · DOI
  26. WEBB P., 1983, Human Nutr., 37, 117
  27. 10.1172/JCI110846 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Ravussin, E., Schutz, Y., Acheson, K. J., Dusmet, M., Bourquin, L., & Jequier, E.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
1985-11-01
Volume
249
Issue
5
Pages
E470-E477
ISSN
  • 0193-1849
  • 1522-1555
Cited by
17
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review