Cited by 484Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Carbohydrate metabolism during pregnancy in control subjects and women with gestational diabetes

Catalano, P. M., Tyzbir, E. D., Wolfe, R. R., Calles, J., Roman, N. M., Amini, S. B., Sims, E. A.·1993·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize carbohydrate metabolism associated with the development of gestational diabetes. Six control (Ctl) and ten women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were evaluated using an intravenous glucose tolerance test and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp with [6,6-2H2]glucose prior to conception (P) and at 12-14 (E), and 34-36 wk of gestation (L). There was an increase (P = 0.0001) in first-phase insulin response in Ctl (P 174 +/- 133, E 388 +/- 120, and L 587 +/- 303 microU/ml) and GDM (P 197 +/- 94, E 267 +/- 77, and L 376 +/- 162 microU/ml) but a significant (P = 0.02) lag in change in GDM with advancing gestation. Basal endogenous glucose production increased during gestation [Ctl: P 2.74 +/- 0.23, E 2.62 +/- 0.38, and L 3.14 +/- 0.36; GDM: P 2.68 +/- 0.51, E 2.78 +/- 0.45, and L 2.98 +/- 0.48 mg.kg fat-free mass (FFM)-1 x min-1; P = 0.02], but there was resistance to suppression by insulin infusion (P = 0.03) in late gestation (GDM: 0.61 +/- 0.44 vs. Ctl: 0.16 +/- 0.17 mg.kg FFM-1 x min-1). Insulin sensitivity decreased during gestation (Ctl: P 10.78 +/- 2.78, E 8.34 +/- 2.36, and L 4.75 +/- 1.22; GDM: P 7.49 +/- 2.13, E 7.40 +/- 1.45, and L 4.21 +/- 1.01 mg.kg FFM-1 x min-1; P = 0.0001) and was primarily decreased (P = 0.04) in GDM compared with Ctl from P through E. These findings closely resemble those of non-insulin-dependent, predominantly insulin-resistant diabetes, which is often a sequel of GDM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.1993.264.1.e60

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Catalano, P. M., Tyzbir, E. D., Wolfe, R. R., Calles, J., Roman, N. M., Amini, S. B., & Sims, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
1993-01-01
Volume
264
Issue
1
Pages
E60-E67
ISSN
  • 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1555
OpenAlex
W1917860558
Cited by
484
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5m01rr000210-26)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (22965)
  • National Center for Research Resources (GCRC-RR-109, GCRC RR-00210)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, carbohydrate metabolism, insulin sensitivity, insulin resistance, first-phase insulin response, endogenous glucose production, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hyperinsulinism, Injections, Intravenous, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Pregnancy, Reference Values, Glucose Clamp Technique, Diabetes, Gestational, Carbohydrate Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review