Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A cross-sectional study on body composition and energy expenditure in women athletes during aging

Ryan, A. S., Nicklas, B. J., Elahi, D.·1996·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

The relationships between total and regional body composition, intra-abdominal adipose tissue (IAAT), resting metabolic rate (RMR), and substrate oxidation were examined in 43 highly trained women athletes and 14 sedentary women aged 18-69 yr. Athletes were divided into four groups (18-29, 30-39, 40-49, and 50-69 yr) and controls into two groups (18-29 and 40-50 yr). Maximal oxygen consumption declined with age (r = -0.52, P < 0.0005) in the athletes and was higher in all groups of athletes than in controls (P < 0.0001). No differences in percent fat and fat-free mass (FFM) were found between the youngest and oldest athletes. Although body mass index was < 25 kg/m2 in all subjects, percent body fat and total fat mass were higher in controls than in athletes for both young and older women (all P < 0.05). FFM was higher in young athletes than in young controls (P < 0.0001). Despite similar percent fat among athletes, IAAT increased with age (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001), but subcutaneous abdominal fat and sagittal diameter did not. IAAT and subcutaneous abdominal fat were also higher in young controls than in young athletes and in older controls than in older athletes (all P < 0.005). Age and FFM were independent predictors of the decline in RMR in the athletes. Fat oxidation (g/day) was highest in the youngest athletes and declined with age (r = -0.47, P < 0.005). We conclude that intense chronic exercise in women athletes prevented the decline in FFM with age. Endurance-trained women have low IAAT stores, which may potentially reduce subsequent risk associated with the metabolic syndrome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.1996.271.5.e916

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. New York, 1986, McGraw-Hill, 654
  2. Poehlman E. T., 1993, Metab. 27), E450
  3. 10.1152/jappl.1990.68.5.2195 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1152/jappl.1993.75.1.108 · DOI
  5. 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.3.818 · DOI
  6. Toth M. J., 1995, Int. J. Obes., 19, 691
  7. 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.1.285 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/ajcn/62.3.527 · DOI
  9. 10.1249/00005768-198401000-00014 · doi:10.1249/00005768-198401000-00014
  10. 10.1249/00005768-199210000-00013 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Wolfe R. R., 1990, Metab. 21), E382

Cited by

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Ryan, A. S., Nicklas, B. J., & Elahi, D.
Affiliations
Department of Medicine, University of Maryland at Baltimore, USA.aryan@umabnet.ab.umd.edu
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
1996-11-01
Volume
271
Issue
5
Pages
E916-E921
ISSN
  • 0193-1849
  • 1522-1555
Cited by
9
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A cross-sectional study on body composition and energy expenditure in women athletes during aging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpendo.1996.271.5.e916
The paper
Ryan, A. S., Nicklas, B. J., & Elahi, D. (1996). A cross-sectional study on body composition and energy expenditure in women athletes during aging. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1996.271.5.e916

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.