The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distribution of intranasal instillations in mice: effects of volume, time, body position, and anesthesia
Abstract
Intranasal instillation techniques are used to deliver various substances to the upper and lower respiratory tract (URT and LRT) in mice. Here, we quantify the relative distribution achieved with intranasal delivery of a nonabsorbable tracer,99m Tc-labeled sulfide-colloid. Relative distribution was determined by killing mice after instillation and quantifying the radioactivity in dissected tissues using gamma scintigraphy. A significant effect of delivery volume on relative distribution was observed when animals were killed 5 min after instillation delivered under gas anesthesia. With a delivery volume of 5 μl, no radiation was detected in the LRT; this increased to a maximum of 55.7 ± 2.5% distribution to the LRT when 50 μl were delivered. The majority of radiation not detected in the LRT was found in the URT. Over the course of the following 1 h, radiation in the LRT remained constant, while that in the URT decreased and appeared in the gastrointestinal tract. Instillation of 25 μl into anesthetized mice resulted in 30.1 ± 6.9% distribution to the LRT, while only 5.3 ± 1.5% ( P < 0.05) of the same volume was detected in the LRT of awake mice. Varying the body position of mice did not affect relative distribution. When using intranasal instillation, the relative distribution between the URT and LRT and the gastrointestinal tract is heavily influenced by delivery volume and level of anesthesia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Does the microbiota regulate immune responses outside the gut?
Noverr, M. C., & Huffnagle, G. B. (2004) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.10.008 · Cited by 499
The ‘microflora hypothesis’ of allergic diseases
Noverr, M. C., & Huffnagle, G. B. (2005) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02379.x · Cited by 394
The microbiome and regulation of mucosal immunity
McDermott, A. J., & Huffnagle, G. B. (2014) · Immunology · doi:10.1111/imm.12231 · Cited by 334
Role of Antibiotics and Fungal Microbiota in Driving Pulmonary Allergic Responses
Noverr, M. C., Noggle, R. M., Toews, G. B., & Huffnagle, G. B. (2004) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.72.9.4996-5003.2004 · Cited by 330
Nicotine activates the chemosensory cation channel TRPA1
Talavera, K., Gees, M., Karashima, Y., Meseguer, V. M., Vanoirbeek, J. A. J., Damann, N., Everaerts, W., Benoit, M., Janssens, A., Vennekens, R., et al. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2379 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Southam, D. S., Dolovich, M., O'Byrne, P. M., & Inman, M. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- L833-L839
- ISSN
- 1040-0605 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1504
- OpenAlex
- W2134596993
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of intranasal instillations in mice: effects of volume, time, body position, and anesthesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajplung.00173.2001
- The paper
- Southam, D. S., Dolovich, M., O'Byrne, P. M., & Inman, M. D. (2002). Distribution of intranasal instillations in mice: effects of volume, time, body position, and anesthesia. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00173.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.