Phlebotomy eliminates the maximal cardiac output response to six weeks of exercise training
Abstract
With this study we tested the hypothesis that 6 wk of endurance training increases maximal cardiac output (Q̇max) relatively more by elevating blood volume (BV) than by inducing structural and functional changes within the heart. Nine healthy but untrained volunteers (V̇o 2max 47 ± 5 ml·min−1·kg−1) underwent supervised training (60 min; 4 times weekly at 65% V̇o 2max for 6 wk), and Q̇max was determined by inert gas rebreathing during cycle ergometer exercise before and after the training period. After the training period, blood volume (determined in duplicates by CO rebreathing) was reestablished to pretraining values by phlebotomy and Q̇max was quantified again. Resting echography revealed no structural heart adaptations as a consequence of the training intervention. After the training period, plasma volume (PV), red blood cell volume (RBCV), and BV increased ( P < 0.05) by 147 ± 168 (5 ± 5%), 235 ± 64 (10 ± 3%), and 382 ± 204 ml (7 ± 4%), respectively. V̇o 2max was augmented ( P < 0.05) by 10 ± 7% after the training period and decreased ( P < 0.05) by 8 ± 7% with phlebotomy. Concomitantly, Q̇max was increased ( P < 0.05) from 18.9 ± 2.1 to 20.4 ± 2.3 l/min (9 ± 6%) as a consequence of the training intervention, and after normalization of BV by phlebotomy Q̇max returned to pretraining values (18.1 ± 2.5 l/min; 12 ± 5% reversal). Thus the exercise training-induced increase in BV is the main mechanism increasing Q̇max after 6 wk of endurance training in previously untrained subjects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical evidence demonstrates that the increase in VO2max with 6 weeks of moderate-to-high intensity ET is primarily attributed to augmented circulating RBCV and oxygen-carrying capacity of blood, as reflected by increases in total circulating Hb mass.
“Empirical evidence demonstrates that the increase in VO 2max with 6 weeks of moderate-to-high intensity ET is primarily attributed to augmented circulating RBCV and oxygen-carrying capacity of blood, as reflected by increases in total circulating Hb mass (Bonne et al., 2014;Montero et al., 2015a).”
From Refuting the myth of non‐response to exercise training: ‘non‐responders’ do respond to higher dose of training (2017) · cites this paper as Bonne et al., 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Montero, D., & Lundby, C. (2017) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp273480 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Self-citationExercise Induces Tissue-Specific Adaptations to Enhance Cardiometabolic Health
Ashcroft, S. P., Stocks, B., Egan, B., & Zierath, J. R. (2024) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2023.12.008 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Peak exercise oxygen uptake during and following long-duration spaceflight
Moore, A. D., Downs, M. E., Lee, S. M. C., Feiveson, A. H., Knudsen, P., & Ploutz-Snyder, L. (2014) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01251.2013 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Utilizing small nutrient compounds as enhancers of exercise-induced mitochondrial biogenesis
Craig, D. M., Ashcroft, S. P., Belew, M. Y., Stocks, B., Currell, K., Baar, K., & Philp, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2015.00296 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
MANDIĆ, M., HANSSON, B., LOVRIĆ, A., SUNDBLAD, P., VOLLAARD, N. B. J., LUNDBERG, T. R., GUSTAFSSON, T., & RULLMAN, E. (2022) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002872 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Tobacco smoking: A stimulus for blood volume expansion
Sotiridis, A., Dardamanis-Aidonas, C., Makris, A., Loukas, I., Geladas, N., & Koskolou, M. (2026) · Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.resp.2025.104505 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bonne, T. C., Doucende, G., Flück, D., Jacobs, R. A., Nordsborg, N. B., Robach, P., Walther, G., & Lundby, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Laboratoire Performance et Santé en Altitude, Université de Perpignan, Font-Romeu, France;
- University of Zurich (CH)
- École nationale des sports de montagne (FR)
- Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Lundby, Carsten
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2014-05-15
- Volume
- 306
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- R752-R760
- ISSN
- 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1490
- OpenAlex
- W2066330579
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 16.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- phlebotomy, maximal cardiac output, endurance training, blood volume, plasma volume, erythrocyte volume, VO2max, inert gas rebreathing, untrained subjects
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Blood Volume, Cardiac Output, Exercise Test, Heart, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Physical Endurance, Stroke Volume, Time Factors, Exercise, Exercise Tolerance, Phlebotomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review