The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metabolism and ventilation in acute hypoxia: a comparative analysis in small mammalian species
Abstract
O2 consumption (VO2), CO2 production (VCO2), and minute ventilation (VE) have been measured during normoxia and hypoxia (10-20 min in 10% O2) in specimens of 27 species from 6 mammalian orders, ranging in body mass (M) from a few grams to several kilograms. In normoxia, both metabolism and VE scaled close to M3/4, VE/VO2 and VE/VCO2 therefore being independent of M. In hypoxia, VE/metabolism increased in all species (on average greater than 100%), mostly because of a drop in VO2. On average, VE was 23% above the normoxic value but in some species decreased below normoxia. VO2 dropped in all but one species, on average 35%. Body temperature decreased by variable amounts, usually more in the smallest species. The decrease in metabolism during hypoxia was positively correlated with the resting metabolic rate of the species in a manner very similar to what can be calculated from data of previously studied newborn mammals. Hence hypoxia may decrease metabolic rate by decreasing thermogenesis, with larger effects in smaller animals, whether newborns or adults, because of their higher thermogenic requirements. We conclude that 1) hypoxic hypometabolism is a general characteristic of the mammalian response to hypoxia and cannot be neglected in the interpretation of ventilatory and cardiovascular responses and 2) its magnitude is inversely related to the resting VO2 of the species and therefore could be less prominent or possibly absent in adults of larger species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peng, Y., Yuan, G., Ramakrishnan, D., Sharma, S. D., Bosch‐Marce, M., Kumar, G. K., Semenza, G. L., & Prabhakar, N. R. (2006) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.114033 · Cited by 366
Physiology of temperature regulation: Comparative aspects
Bicego, K. C., Barros, R. C. H., & Branco, L. G. S. (2007) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.06.032 · Cited by 276
Neonatal tolerance to hypoxia: a comparative-physiological approach
Singer, D. (1999) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/s1095-6433(99)00057-4 · Cited by 172
Body size-independent safety margins for gas exchange across grasshopper species
Greenlee, K. J., Nebeker, C., & Harrison, J. F. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.001982 · Cited by 39
Han, X.-T., Xie, A.-Y., Bi, X.-C., Liu, S.-J., & Hu, L.-H. (2002) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn2002610 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Frappell, P., Lanthier, C., Baudinette, R. V., & Mortola, J. P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1992-06-01
- Volume
- 262
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- R1040-R1046
- ISSN
- 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1490
- OpenAlex
- W1923702019
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolism and ventilation in acute hypoxia: a comparative analysis in small mammalian species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpregu.1992.262.6.r1040
- The paper
- Frappell, P., Lanthier, C., Baudinette, R. V., & Mortola, J. P. (1992). Metabolism and ventilation in acute hypoxia: a comparative analysis in small mammalian species. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1992.262.6.r1040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.