The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-flow microinfusion: tissue penetration and pharmacodynamics
Abstract
High-flow microinfusion provides a means for delivering macromolecules to large volumes of brain in easily obtainable time intervals. Slowly degraded approximately 180-kDa macromolecules, delivered at a constant volumetric flow rate of 3 microliters/min into homogeneous brain tissue (e.g., gray matter), would penetrate to a 1.5-cm radius in 12 h. The predicted concentration profile is relatively flat until it declines precipitously at the flow front. Hence, tissues are dosed rather uniformly, providing control over the undesired toxicity that may occur with alternative methods that depend on large concentration gradients for tissue transport. The penetration advantage of high-flow (convective) over low-flow (diffusive) microinfusion has been assessed at fixed pharmacodynamic effect. A 12-h high-flow microinfusion of a macromolecule degraded with a characteristic time of 33.5 h would provide 5- to 10-fold increases in volume over low-flow infusion and total treatment volumes > 10 cm3. Slower degradation rates would result in larger treatment volumes; more rapid degradation rates would reduce the volume but still favor convective over diffusive administration. This technique may be applicable to a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic agents such as radioimmunoconjugates, immunotoxins, enzymes, growth factors, and oligonucleotides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Langer, R. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2218494 · Cited by 1,778
Polymers for the sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules
LANGER, R., & FOLKMAN, J. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/263797a0 · Cited by 1,182
Bulk flow of brain interstitial fluid under normal and hyperosmolar conditions
Rosenberg, G. A., Kyner, W. T., & Estrada, E. (1980) · American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.1980.238.1.f42 · Cited by 210
Cited by
Evidence for bulk flow of brain interstitial fluid: significance for physiology and pathology
Abbott, N. J. (2004) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2003.11.006 · Cited by 786
Mechanisms of fluid movement into, through and out of the brain: evaluation of the evidence
Hladky, S. B., & Barrand, M. A. (2014) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/2045-8118-11-26 · Cited by 633
CSF, blood-brain barrier, and brain drug delivery
Pardridge, W. M. (2016) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1517/17425247.2016.1171315 · Cited by 508
Diffusion and related transport mechanisms in brain tissue
Nicholson, C. (2001) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/64/7/202 · Cited by 490
Lidar, Z., Mardor, Y., Jonas, T., Pfeffer, R., Faibel, M., Nass, D., Hadani, M., & Ram, Z. (2004) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2004.100.3.0472 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrison, P. F., Laske, D. W., Bobo, H., Oldfield, E. H., & Dedrick, R. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- R292-R305
- ISSN
- 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1490
- OpenAlex
- W2280420202
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-flow microinfusion: tissue penetration and pharmacodynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpregu.1994.266.1.r292
- The paper
- Morrison, P. F., Laske, D. W., Bobo, H., Oldfield, E. H., & Dedrick, R. L. (1994). High-flow microinfusion: tissue penetration and pharmacodynamics. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1994.266.1.r292
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.