Cited by 90Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlGastrointestinal motility and disorders

A method for selective section of vagal afferent or efferent axons in the rat

Norgren, R., Smith, G. P.·1994·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

Although normally a mixed nerve, intracranially the vagus separates into dorsal rootlets that contain afferent axons and ventral rootlets that contain efferents. Surgical procedures are described for exposing the ventral surface of the occipital bone at the level where the vagus passes through the posterior lacerated foramen. When the foramen is expanded medially and the dura lanced, the intracranial course of the vagus can be observed by use of an operating microscope. Under these conditions, either the efferent or the afferent rootlets can be severed selectively. When the dorsal rootlets are divided and the contralateral trunk is cut below the diaphragm, a selective bilateral subdiaphragmatic afferent vagotomy is produced with unilateral sparing of the efferents. Cutting the efferents intracranially has the converse effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.1994.267.4.r1136

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation highlights the involvement of vagal afferents in anxiety-like and fear-related behavior.

    “In addition, subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation (Vazquez et al., 2016) a method that eliminates abdominal vagal afferents, but keeps most efferents intact (Norgren and Smith, 1994) highlights the involvement of vagal afferents in anxiety-like (elevated plus maze, open-field test, food neophobia) and fear-related behavior (auditory-cued fear conditioning) (Klarer et al.,”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Norgren and Smith, 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norgren, R., & Smith, G. P.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
1994-10-01
Volume
267
Issue
4
Pages
R1136-R1141
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W2197487676
Cited by
90
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-00653)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC 00240, R01DC000240)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK33248)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
vagus nerve, selective vagotomy, vagal afferents, vagal efferent fibers, dorsal rootlets, occipital bone, subdiaphragmatic vagotomy
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Axons, Axonal Transport, Efferent Pathways, Horseradish Peroxidase, Medulla Oblongata, Neurophysiology, Neurosurgery, Vagus Nerve, Wheat Germ Agglutinins, Wheat Germ Agglutinin-Horseradish Peroxidase Conjugate, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review