Cited by 159Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Gut Vagal Afferents Differentially Modulate Innate Anxiety and Learned Fear

Open access
Klarer, Melanie, Arnold, Myrtha, Günther, Lydia, Winter, Christine, Langhans, Wolfgang, Meyer, Urs·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Vagal afferents are an important neuronal component of the gut–brain axis allowing bottom-up information flow from the viscera to the CNS. In addition to its role in ingestive behavior, vagal afferent signaling has been implicated modulating mood and affect, including distinct forms of anxiety and fear. Here, we used a rat model of subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation (SDA), the most complete and selective vagal deafferentation method existing to date, to study the consequences of complete disconnection of abdominal vagal afferents on innate anxiety, conditioned fear, and neurochemical parameters in the limbic system. We found that compared with Sham controls, SDA rats consistently displayed reduced innate anxiety-like behavior in three procedures commonly used in preclinical rodent models of anxiety, namely the elevated plus maze test, open field test, and food neophobia test. On the other hand, SDA rats exhibited increased expression of auditory-cued fear conditioning, which specifically emerged as attenuated extinction of conditioned fear during the tone re-exposure test. The behavioral manifestations in SDA rats were associated with region-dependent changes in noradrenaline and GABA levels in key areas of the limbic system, but not with functional alterations in the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal grand stress. Our study demonstrates that innate anxiety and learned fear are both subjected to visceral modulation through abdominal vagal afferents, possibly via changing limbic neurotransmitter systems. These data add further weight to theories emphasizing an important role of afferent visceral signals in the regulation of emotional behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0252-14.2014

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gut vagal afferents influence anxiety and learned fear.

    “Recently, it has been shown that gut vagal afferents also influence anxiety and learned fear (Klarer et al. 2014).”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Klarer et al. 2014

  • Subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation highlights the involvement of vagal afferents in anxiety-like and fear-related behavior.

    “In addition, subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation (Vazquez et al., 2016) a method that eliminates abdominal vagal afferents, but keeps most efferents intact (Norgren and Smith, 1994) highlights the involvement of vagal afferents in anxiety-like (elevated plus maze, open-field test, food neophobia) and fear-related behavior (auditory-cued fear conditioning) (Klarer et al.,”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Klarer et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klarer, M., Arnold, M., Günther, L., Winter, C., Langhans, W., & Meyer, U.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-05-21
Volume
34
Issue
21
Pages
7067-7076
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2028119064
Cited by
159
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • European Commission (259679)
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH-25_13-2, 25_13-2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
vagal afferents, gut-brain axis, learned fear, fear extinction, norepinephrine, GABA, limbic system, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, emotional behavior, food neophobia
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Conditioning, Classical, Eating, Exploratory Behavior, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Functional Laterality, Male, Sincalide, Vagus Nerve, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Neurotransmitter Agents, Maze Learning, Gastrointestinal Tract, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review