Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Paradoxes of nitric oxide in the diabetic kidney

Komers, Radko, Anderson, Sharon·2003·American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology

Abstract

As an important modulator of renal function and morphology, the nitric oxide (NO) system has been extensively studied in the diabetic kidney. However, a number of studies in different experimental and clinical settings have produced often confusing data and contradictory findings. We have reviewed a wide spectrum of findings and issues that have amassed concerning the pathophysiology of the renal NO system in diabetes, pointed out the controversies, and attempted to find some explanation for these discrepancies. Severe diabetes with profound insulinopenia can be viewed as a state of generalized NO deficiency, including in the kidney. However, we have focused our hypotheses and conclusions on the events occurring during moderate glycemic control with some degree of treatment with exogenous insulin, representing more the clinically applicable state of diabetic nephropathy. Available evidence suggests that diabetes triggers mechanisms that in parallel enhance and suppress NO bioavailability in the kidney. We hypothesize that during the early phases of nephropathy, the balance between these two opposing forces is shifted toward NO. This plays a role in the development of characteristic hemodynamic changes and may contribute to consequent structural alterations in glomeruli. Both endothelial (eNOS) and neuronal NO synthase can contribute to altered NO production. These enzymes, particularly eNOS, can be activated by Ca 2+-independent and alternative routes of activation that may be elusive in traditional methods of investigation. As the duration of exposure to the diabetic milieu increases, factors that suppress NO bioavailability gradually prevail. Increasing accumulations of advanced glycation end products may be one of the culprits in this process. In addition, this balance is continuously modified by actual metabolic control and the degree of insulinopenia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajprenal.00265.2002

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Komers, R., & Anderson, S.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
284
Issue
6
Pages
F1121-F1137
ISSN
  • 1522-1466 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-857X
OpenAlex
W2160734991
Cited by
191
References
8
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paradoxes of nitric oxide in the diabetic kidney. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajprenal.00265.2002
The paper
Komers, R., & Anderson, S. (2003). Paradoxes of nitric oxide in the diabetic kidney. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00265.2002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.