The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maximal Oxygen Intake and Its Relation to Body Composition, With Special Reference to Chronic Physical Activity and Obesity
Abstract
The maximal oxygen intake (Max Vo2) was determined in 46 healthy male students and 13 soldiers along with the weight of body fat as estimated by immersion densitometry. In 41 the active tissue and cell mass were estimated from measurements of blood volume, thiocyanate space and antipyrine space. The correlation coefficients between Max Vo2 and a) fat-free body weight, b) active tissue, c) body weight and d) cell mass were found to be 0.85, 0.91, 0.63 and 0.45, respectively. Max Vo2 was related to blood volume and red cell volume by correlation coefficients of 0.78 and 0.69 which was shown to be dependent on relationship between fat-free weight and blood volume (r = 0.76). It was shown that students who participated in athletics had a significantly larger Max Vo2 per kilogram of fat-free body weight than the sedentary group. The largest values occurred in cross-country runners. The sedentary students who did not take part in athletics were divided into three groups according to their body composition, i.e. more than 25% fat, 10–25% fat and less than 10% fat. It was shown that there was no difference in Max Vo2 per kilogram of fat-free weight in the three groups. It is concluded that when Vo2 is used to examine the capacity to perform exhausting work the values should be expressed as Vo2 per kilogram of body weight; that when the test is used to examine the performance of the respiratory-cardiovascular system, the values should be expressed as Vo2 per kilogram of fat-free weight. It is also concluded that physical conditioning affects the maximum Vo2 independently of the mass of active tissue and that obesity per se has no effect on the maximal performance of the respiratory-cardiovascular system in young men. Submitted on December 28, 1956
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE PHYSIOLOGICAL MEANING OF THE MAXIMAL OXYGEN INTAKE TEST1
Mitchell, J. H., Sproule, B. J., & Chapman, C. B. (1958) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci103636 · Cited by 516
A Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Men and Women
Sparling, P. B. (1980) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1980.10608077 · Cited by 142
Structural and functional body components in athletic health and performance phenotypes
Silva, A. M. (2019) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-018-0321-9 · Cited by 107
Muñoz-Martínez, F. A., Rubio-Arias, J. Á., Ramos-Campo, D. J., & Alcaraz, P. E. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0773-4 · Cited by 77
Metabolic equivalent (MET) inflation — not the MET we used to know
Lavie, C. J., & Milani, R. V. (2007) · Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention · doi:10.1097/01.hcr.0000270692.09258.6a · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Buskirk, E., & Taylor, H. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1957-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-78
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2172312337
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximal Oxygen Intake and Its Relation to Body Composition, With Special Reference to Chronic Physical Activity and Obesity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1957.11.1.72
- The paper
- Buskirk, E., & Taylor, H. L. (1957). Maximal Oxygen Intake and Its Relation to Body Composition, With Special Reference to Chronic Physical Activity and Obesity. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1957.11.1.72
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.