Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 453

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Myoelectric signal versus force relationship in different human muscles

Lawrence, J. H., De Luca, C. J.·1983·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

An analytic study was initiated to investigate whether the normalized surface myoelectric signal vs. normalized force relationship varies in different human muscles and whether it is dependent on training level and rate of force production. The data were obtained from experiments that involved the biceps, deltoid, and first dorsal interosseous of three pianists, four long-distance swimmers, three power lifters, and six normal subjects. The elite performers (among the world's best) were chosen because they exhibited varying degrees of fine motor control, endurance training, and power training in different muscles. Approximately 200 isometric linearly force-varying contractions peaking at 80% of the maximal voluntary contraction level were processed. The results indicated that the myoelectric signal-force relationship was primarily determined by the muscle under investigation and was generally independent of the subject group and the force rate. Whereas this relationship was quasilinear for the first dorsal interosseous, it was nonlinear for the biceps and deltoid. Several possible physiological causes of the observed behavior of the myoelectric signal-force relationship are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.6.1653

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 453

Metadata

Authors
Lawrence, J. H., & De Luca, C. J.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1983-06-01
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
1653-1659
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W1916824887
Cited by
453
References
2
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.