The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of abdominal pressure on venous return: abdominal vascular zone conditions
Abstract
The effects of changes in abdominal pressure (Pab) on inferior vena cava (IVC) venous return were analyzed using a model of the IVC circulation based on a concept of abdominal vascular zone conditions analogous to pulmonary vascular zone conditions. We hypothesized that an increase in Pab would increase IVC venous return when the IVC pressure at the level of the diaphragm (Pivc) exceeds the sum of Pab and the critical closing transmural pressure (Pc), i.e., zone 3 conditions, but reduce IVC venous return when Pivc is below the sum of Pab and Pc, i.e., zone 2 conditions. The validity of the model was tested in 12 canine experiments with an open-chest IVC bypass. An increase in Pab produced by phrenic stimulation increased the IVC venous return when Pivc-Pab was positive but decreased the IVC venous return when Pivc - Pab was negative. The value of Pivc - Pab that separated net increases from decreases in venous return was 1.00 +/- 0.72 (SE) mmHg (n = 6). An increase in Pivc did not influence the femoral venous pressure when Pivc was lower than the sum of Pab and a constant, 0.96 +/- 0.70 mmHg (n = 6), consistent with presence of a waterfall. These results agreed closely with the predictions of the model and its computer simulation. The abdominal venous compartment appears to function with changes in Pab either as a capacitor in zone 3 conditions or as a collapsible Starling resistor with little wall tone in zone 2 conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Barbier, C., Loubières, Y., Schmit, C., Hayon, J., Ricôme, J.-L., Jardin, F., & Vieillard-Baron, A. (2004) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-004-2259-8 · Cited by 940
Influence of expiratory loading and hyperinflation on cardiac output during exercise
Stark-Leyva, K. N., Beck, K. C., & Johnson, B. D. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00756.2003 · Cited by 118
The effect of breathing manner on inferior vena caval diameter
Kimura, B. J., Dalugdugan, R., Gilcrease, G. W., Phan, J. N., Showalter, B. K., & Wolfson, T. (2011) · European Journal of Echocardiography · doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jeq157 · Cited by 97
Intrinsic PEEP and cardiopulmonary interaction in patients with COPD and acute ventilatory failure
Ranieri, V., Dambrosio, M., & Brienza, N. (1996) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.96.09061283 · Cited by 85
Del Pozzi, A. T., Schwartz, C. E., Tewari, D., Medow, M. S., & Stewart, J. M. (2014) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.113.02824 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Takata, M., Wise, R. A., & Robotham, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1990-12-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1961-1972
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W1902310801
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of abdominal pressure on venous return: abdominal vascular zone conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1990.69.6.1961
- The paper
- Takata, M., Wise, R. A., & Robotham, J. L. (1990). Effects of abdominal pressure on venous return: abdominal vascular zone conditions. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1990.69.6.1961
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.