The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hypoxic effects on exercise-induced diaphragmatic fatigue in normal healthy humans
Abstract
We examined the effects of hypoxia on exercise-induced diaphragmatic fatigue. Eleven subjects with a mean maximal O2 uptake of 52.4 +/- 0.7 ml.kg-1.min-1 completed one normoxic (arterial O2 saturation 96-94%) and one hypoxic (inspiratory O2 fraction = 0.15; arterial O2 saturation 83–77%) exercise test at 85% maximal O2 uptake to exhaustion on separate days. Supramaximal bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation (BPNS) was used to determine the pressure generation of the diaphragm pre- and postexercise at 1, 10, and 20 Hz. There was increased flow limitation during hypoxic vs. normoxic exercise. There was a decrease in hypoxic exercise time (normoxic 24.9 +/- 0.7 min vs. hypoxic 15.8 +/- 0.8 min; P < 0.05). After exercise the BPNS transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) was significantly reduced at 1 and 10 Hz after both exercise tests. The BPNS Pdi was recovered to control values by 60 min postnormoxic exercise but was still reduced 90 min posthypoxic exercise. The mean percent fall in the stimulated BPNS Pdi was similar (normoxic -24.8 +/- 4.7%; hypoxic -18.8 +/- 3.0%) after both exercise conditions. Experiencing the same amount of diaphragm fatigue in a shorter time period in hypoxic exercise may have been due to 1) the increased expiratory flow limitation and diaphragmatic muscle work, 2) decreased O2 transport to the diaphragm, and/or 3) increased levels of circulating metabolites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In fact, it has been shown by objectively assessing changes in transdiaphragmatic and abdominal muscle contractility after exercise that not only inspiratory [30][31][32][33] but also expiratory muscles [16,[34][35][36] fatigue during exhaustive high intensity endurance exercise.”
From Effect of Respiratory Muscle Training on Exercise Performance in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2012) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanical Constraints on Exercise Hyperpnea in a Fit Aging Population
Johnson, B. D., Reddan, W. G., Seow, K. C., & Dempsey, J. A. (1991) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/143.5_pt_1.968 · Cited by 150
Self-citation
Cited by
Illi, S. K., Held, U., Frank, I., & Spengler, C. M. (2012) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf03262290 · Cited by 411
Respiratory mechanics during exercise in endurance‐trained men and women
Guenette, J. A., Witt, J. D., McKenzie, D. C., Road, J. D., & Sheel, A. W. (2007) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.126466 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Babcock, M. A., Johnson, B. D., Pegelow, D. F., Suman, O. E., Griffin, D., & Dempsey, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1995-01-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-92
- ISSN
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.