The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water
Open accessAbstract
The use of movement registration for daily physical activity assessment was evaluated during a 7-day period in 30 free-living subjects. Body movement was registered with a Tracmor motion sensor consisting of a triaxial accelerometer and a data unit for on-line processing of accelerometer output over 1-min intervals. Average Tracmor output was correlated against four different energy estimates: 1) average daily metabolic rate (ADMR), determined with doubly labeled water; 2) ADMR-sleeping metabolic rate (SMR; determined in a respiration chamber); 3) (ADMR-SMR) per kilogram of body mass; and 4) the overall physical activity level (PAL = ADMR/SMR). The highest correlation was found for the relationship between Tracmor output and PAL (r = 0.58). After correction for Tracmor values arising from vibrations produced by transportation means, this correlation was improved to 0.73. There was no difference between Tracmor output and PAL in discriminating between overall activity levels with "low" (PAL < 1.60), "moderate" (1.60 < or = PAL < or = 1.85), and "high" (PAL > 1.85) intensity. It is concluded that the Tracmor can be used in free-living subjects to distinguish among interindividual as well as intraindividual levels of daily physical activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of the pattern of food intake on human energy metabolism
Verboeket-Van De Venne, W. P. H. G., Westerterp, K. R., & Kester, A. D. M. (1993) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19930108 · Cited by 79
Self-citation
Cited by
Physical Activity Assessment With Accelerometers: An Evaluation Against Doubly Labeled Water
Plasqui, G., & Westerterp, K. R. (2007) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2007.281 · Cited by 654
Self-citationEston, R. G., Rowlands, A. V., & Ingledew, D. K. (1998) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1998.84.1.362 · Cited by 643
Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field
HENDELMAN, D., MILLER, K., BAGGETT, C., DEBOLD, E., & FREEDSON, P. (2000) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200009001-00002 · Cited by 516
Measurement of energy expenditure
Levine, J. A. (2005) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2005800 · Cited by 401
Physical activity but not energy expenditure is reduced in obese adolescents: a case-control study
Ekelund, U., Åman, J., Yngve, A., Renman, C., Westerterp, K., & Sjöström, M. (2002) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/76.5.935 · Cited by 272
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouten, C. V., Verboeket-van de Venne, W. P., Westerterp, K. R., Verduin, M., & Janssen, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1019-1026
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2118789007
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1996.81.2.1019
- The paper
- Bouten, C. V., Verboeket-van de Venne, W. P., Westerterp, K. R., Verduin, M., & Janssen, J. D. (1996). Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1996.81.2.1019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.