The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recent advances in pulmonary drug delivery using large, porous inhaled particles
Abstract
The ability to deliver proteins and peptides to the systemic circulation by inhalation has contributed to a rise in the number of inhalation therapies under investigation. For most of these therapies, aerosols are designed to comprise small spherical droplets or particles of mass density near 1 g/cm 3 and mean geometric diameter between ∼1 and 3 μm, suitable for particle penetration into the airways or lung periphery. Studies performed primarily with liquid aerosols have shown that these characteristics of inhaled aerosols lead to optimal therapeutic effect, both for local and systemic therapeutic delivery. Inefficient drug delivery can still arise, owing to excessive particle aggregation in an inhaler, deposition in the mouth and throat, and overly rapid particle removal from the lungs by mucocilliary or phagocytic clearance mechanisms. To address these problems, particle surface chemistry and surface roughness are traditionally manipulated. Recent data indicate that major improvements in aerosol particle performance may also be achieved by lowering particle mass density and increasing particle size, since large, porous particles display less tendency to agglomerate than (conventional) small and nonporous particles. Also, large, porous particles inhaled into the lungs can potentially release therapeutic substances for long periods of time by escaping phagocytic clearance from the lung periphery, thus enabling therapeutic action for periods ranging from hours to many days.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mundargi, R. C., Babu, V. R., Rangaswamy, V., Patel, P., & Aminabhavi, T. M. (2008) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.09.013 · Cited by 1,025
Violent expiratory events: on coughing and sneezing
Bourouiba, L., Dehandschoewercker, E., & Bush, J. W. M. (2014) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2014.88 · Cited by 828
PLGA–PEI nanoparticles for gene delivery to pulmonary epithelium
Bivas-Benita, M., Romeijn, S., Junginger, H. E., & Borchard, G. (2004) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.03.008 · Cited by 256
Koushik, K., & Kompella, U. B. (2004) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/b:pham.0000019308.25479.a4 · Cited by 86
Aerosolized nanostructured itraconazole as prophylaxis against invasive pulmonary aspergillosis
Alvarez, C. A., Wiederhold, N. P., McConville, J. T., Peters, J. I., Najvar, L. K., Graybill, J. R., Coalson, J. J., Talbert, R. L., Burgess, D. S., Bocanegra, R., et al. (2007) · Journal of Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2007.01.014 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, D. A., Ben-Jebria, A., & Langer, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1998-08-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 379-385
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2273327004
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances in pulmonary drug delivery using large, porous inhaled particles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.379
- The paper
- Edwards, D. A., Ben-Jebria, A., & Langer, R. (1998). Recent advances in pulmonary drug delivery using large, porous inhaled particles. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.