Cited by 828Infection Control and VentilationParticle Dynamics in Fluid FlowsFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

Violent expiratory events: on coughing and sneezing

Open access
Bourouiba, Lydia, Dehandschoewercker, Eline, Bush, John W. M.·2014·Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Abstract

Abstract Violent respiratory events such as coughs and sneezes play a key role in transferring respiratory diseases between infectious and susceptible individuals. We present the results of a combined experimental and theoretical investigation of the fluid dynamics of such violent expiratory events. Direct observation of sneezing and coughing events reveals that such flows are multiphase turbulent buoyant clouds with suspended droplets of various sizes. Our observations guide the development of an accompanying theoretical model of pathogen-bearing droplets interacting with a turbulent buoyant momentum puff. We develop in turn discrete and continuous models of droplet fallout from the cloud in order to predict the range of pathogens. According to the discrete fallout model droplets remain suspended in the cloud until their settling speed matches that of the decelerating cloud. A continuous fallout model is developed by adapting models of sedimentation from turbulent fluids. The predictions of our theoretical models are tested against data gathered from a series of analogue experiments in which a particle-laden cloud is ejected into a relatively dense ambient. Our study highlights the importance of the multiphase nature of respiratory clouds, specifically the suspension of the smallest drops by circulation within the cloud, in extending the range of respiratory pathogens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/jfm.2014.88

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. IMF/WORLD BANK, 2006 Press briefing: Avian flu. In Proc. IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings Suntec.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bourouiba, L., Dehandschoewercker, E., & Bush, J. W. M.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Physique et Mécanique des Milieux Hétérogènes (FR)
Corresponding author
Bourouiba, Lydia
Venue
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2014-03-24
Volume
745
Pages
537-563
ISSN
  • 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7645
OpenAlex
W2113076742
Cited by
828
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 127 · 2021: 224 · 2020: 161 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1022356)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Keywords
cough, sneezing, expiratory flow, respiratory droplets, pathogen transmission, droplet settling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review