Cited by 111Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingBiochemical effects in animals

Creatine supplementation increases muscle total creatine but not maximal intermittent exercise performance

McKenna, Michael J., Morton, Judith, Selig, Steve E., Snow, Rodney J.·1999·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

This study investigated creatine supplementation (CrS) effects on muscle total creatine (TCr), creatine phosphate (CrP), and intermittent sprinting performance by using a design incorporating the time course of the initial increase and subsequent washout period of muscle TCr. Two groups of seven volunteers ingested either creatine [Cr; 6 × (5 g Cr-H 2 O + 5 g dextrose)/day)] or a placebo (6 × 5 g dextrose/day) over 5 days. Five 10-s maximal cycle ergometer sprints with rest intervals of 180, 50, 20, and 20 s and a resting vastus lateralis biopsy were conducted before and 0, 2, and 4 wk after placebo or CrS. Resting muscle TCr, CrP, and Cr were unchanged after the placebo but were increased ( P < 0.05) at 0 [by 22.9 ± 4.2, 8.9 ± 1.9, and 14.0 ± 3.3 (SE) mmol/kg dry mass, respectively] and 2 but not 4 wk after CrS. An apparent placebo main effect of increased peak power and cumulative work was found after placebo and CrS, but no treatment (CrS) main effect was found on either variable. Thus, despite the rise and washout of muscle TCr and CrP, maximal intermittent sprinting performance was unchanged by CrS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1999.87.6.2244

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CrM loading or low-dose long-term intake increases muscle creatine retention typically by 20-40% depending on initial muscle creatine content.

    “Prior studies indicate that CrM loading (i.e., 4 × 5 g/day for 5–7 days) or low-dose long-term intake (e.g., 3–6 g/day for 4–12 weeks) increases muscle creatine retention typically by 20–40% depending on initial creatine content in the muscle [12,22,68,69,70,71]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKenna, M. J., Morton, J., Selig, S. E., & Snow, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1999-12-01
Volume
87
Issue
6
Pages
2244-2252
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W1762661743
Cited by
111
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
Keywords
creatine supplementation, phosphocreatine, peak power, vastus lateralis, washout period, placebo effect, D-glucose
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Creatine, Double-Blind Method, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review