The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of resistance exercise combined with moderate vascular occlusion on muscular function in humans
Abstract
Acute and long-term effects of resistance exercise combined with vascular occlusion on muscular function were investigated. Changes in integrated electromyogram with respect to time (iEMG), vascular resistive index, and plasma lactate concentration were measured in five men either during or after elbow flexion exercises with the proximal end of the arm occluded at 0–100 mmHg. The mean iEMG, postexercise hyperemia, and plasma lactate concentration were all elevated with the increase in occlusion pressure at a low-intensity exercise, whereas they were unchanged with the increase in occlusion pressure at high-intensity exercise. To investigate the long-term effects of low-intensity exercise with occlusion, older women ( n = 24) were subjected to a 16-wk exercise training for elbow flexor muscles, in which low-intensity [∼50–30% one repetition maximum (1 RM)] exercise with occlusion at ∼110 mmHg (LIO), low-intensity exercise without occlusion (LI), and high- to medium-intensity (∼80–50% 1 RM) exercise without occlusion (HI) were performed. Percent increases in both cross-sectional area and isokinetic strength of elbow flexor muscles after LIO were larger than those after LI ( P < 0.05) and similar to those after HI. The results suggest that resistance exercise at an intensity even lower than 50% 1 RM is effective in inducing muscular hypertrophy and concomitant increase in strength when combined with vascular occlusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-p superfamily member
McPherron, A. C., Lawler, A. M., & Lee, S.-J. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387083a0 · Cited by 4,013
FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CELL SIZE IN SPINAL MOTONEURONS
Henneman, E., Somjen, G., & Carpenter, D. O. (1965) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.560 · Cited by 2,294
Biochemical Adaptations to Endurance Exercise in Muscle
Holloszy, J. O., & Booth, F. W. (1976) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.38.030176.001421 · Cited by 1,053
Potential for gross muscle hypertrophy in older men
Moritani, T., & Devries, H. A. (1980) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/35.5.672 · Cited by 362
Cited by
The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training
Schoenfeld, B. J. (2010) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181e840f3 · Cited by 1,214
Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men
Mitchell, C. J., Churchward-Venne, T. A., West, D. W. D., Burd, N. A., Breen, L., Baker, S. K., & Phillips, S. M. (2012) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012 · Cited by 627
Wernbom, M., Augustsson, J., & Thome??, R. (2007) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200737030-00004 · Cited by 583
A review on the mechanisms of blood-flow restriction resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy
Pearson, S. J., & Hussain, S. R. (2015) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0264-9 · Cited by 592
Lixandrão, M. E., Ugrinowitsch, C., Berton, R., Vechin, F. C., Conceição, M. S., Damas, F., Libardi, C. A., & Roschel, H. (2018) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Takarada, Y., Takazawa, H., Sato, Y., Takebayashi, S., Tanaka, Y., & Ishii, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2097-2106
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2112184791
- Cited by
- 848
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.