The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex differences in the fatigability of arm muscles depends on absolute force during isometric contractions
Abstract
Women are capable of longer endurance times compared with men for contractions performed at low to moderate intensities. The purpose of the study was 1) to determine the relation between the absolute target force and endurance time for a submaximal isometric contraction and 2) to compare the pressor response and muscle activation patterns of men [26.3 ± 1.1 (SE) yr] and women (27.5 ± 2.3 yr) during a fatiguing contraction performed with the elbow flexor muscles. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force was greater for men (393 ± 23 vs. 177 ± 7 N), which meant that the average target force (20% of MVC) was greater for men (79.7 ± 6.5 vs. 36.7 ± 2.0 N). The endurance time for the fatiguing contractions was 118% longer for women (1,806 ± 239 vs. 829 ± 94 s). The average of the rectified electromyogram (%MVC) for the elbow flexor muscles at exhaustion was similar for men (31 ± 2%) and women (30 ± 2%). In contrast, the heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were less at exhaustion for women (94 ± 6 vs. 111 ± 7 beats/min and 121 ± 5 vs. 150 ± 6 mmHg, respectively). The target force and change in MAP during the fatiguing contraction were exponentially related to endurance time ( r 2 = 0.68 and r 2 = 0.64, respectively), whereas the change in MAP was linearly related to target force ( r 2 = 0.51). The difference in fatigability of men and women when performing a submaximal contraction was related to the absolute contraction intensity and was limited by mechanisms that were distal to the activation of muscle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender differences in substrate for endurance exercise
Tarnopolsky, L. J., MacDougall, J. D., Atkinson, S. A., Tarnopolsky, M. A., & Sutton, J. R. (1990) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1990.68.1.302 · Cited by 470 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, sex differences in substrate utilization (46, 47) might reduce the rate of metabolite production and reflex-mediated change in MAP in women compared with men, which would also contribute to the prolongation of endurance time.”
BackgroundThe relationship between maximum isometric strength and intramuscular circulatory occlusion
BARNES, W. S. (1980) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140138008924748 · Cited by 200
Fulco, Rock, Muza, Lammi, Cymerman, Butterfield, Moore, Braun, & Lewis (1999) · Acta Physiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1046/j.1365-201x.1999.00613.x · Cited by 192
Gender Differences in Substrate Metabolism During Endurance Exercise
Tarnopolsky, M. A. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1139/h00-024 · Cited by 185
Effect of estradiol on tissue glycogen metabolism and lipid availability in exercised male rats
Kendrick, Z. V., & Ellis, G. S. (1991) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1991.71.5.1694 · Cited by 114 · cited 1×
“Alternatively, the reduced increase in MAP in the women may have been the result of an attenuated sympathetic neural outflow (7, 31), possibly due to estrogen (8, 22, 23, 33), that reduced vasoconstriction, maintained muscle perfusion, and prolonged endurance time.”
BackgroundComparison of physiological responses of women and men to isometric exercise
Petrofsky, J. S., Burse, R. L., & Lind, A. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1975.38.5.863 · Cited by 107 · cited 1×
“This sex difference has been observed in several muscle groups, including adductor pollicis (5, 13), elbow flexors (19, 37), extrinsic finger flexors (32, 48), and knee extensors (27).”
Background
Cited by
Translating Fatigue to Human Performance
ENOKA, R. M., & DUCHATEAU, J. (2016) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000000929 · Cited by 948
Self-citationSex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses
Hunter, S. K. (2014) · Acta Physiologica · doi:10.1111/apha.12234 · Cited by 595
Self-citationSex-Based Differences in Skeletal Muscle Kinetics and Fiber-Type Composition
Haizlip, K. M., Harrison, B. C., & Leinwand, L. A. (2015) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiol.00024.2014 · Cited by 521
Mendez-Villanueva, A., Hamer, P., & Bishop, D. (2008) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-008-0723-9 · Cited by 247
Sex-Related Differences in Gene Expression in Human Skeletal Muscle
Welle, S., Tawil, R., & Thornton, C. A. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001385 · Cited by 224
“There is sexual dimorphism of skeletal muscle in overall mass, size of individual fibers, activities of several metabolic enzymes, lipid content and oxidation, relative expression of different myosin isoforms, fatigability, and expression of a number of genes [1–9].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hunter, S. K., & Enoka, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2686-2694
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W1901324775
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex differences in the fatigability of arm muscles depends on absolute force during isometric contractions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2686
- The paper
- Hunter, S. K., & Enoka, R. M. (2001). Sex differences in the fatigability of arm muscles depends on absolute force during isometric contractions. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2686
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.