Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sex differences in the fatigability of arm muscles depends on absolute force during isometric contractions

Hunter, Sandra K., Enoka, Roger M.·2001·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Women are capable of longer endurance times compared with men for contractions performed at low to moderate intensities. The purpose of the study was 1) to determine the relation between the absolute target force and endurance time for a submaximal isometric contraction and 2) to compare the pressor response and muscle activation patterns of men [26.3 ± 1.1 (SE) yr] and women (27.5 ± 2.3 yr) during a fatiguing contraction performed with the elbow flexor muscles. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force was greater for men (393 ± 23 vs. 177 ± 7 N), which meant that the average target force (20% of MVC) was greater for men (79.7 ± 6.5 vs. 36.7 ± 2.0 N). The endurance time for the fatiguing contractions was 118% longer for women (1,806 ± 239 vs. 829 ± 94 s). The average of the rectified electromyogram (%MVC) for the elbow flexor muscles at exhaustion was similar for men (31 ± 2%) and women (30 ± 2%). In contrast, the heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were less at exhaustion for women (94 ± 6 vs. 111 ± 7 beats/min and 121 ± 5 vs. 150 ± 6 mmHg, respectively). The target force and change in MAP during the fatiguing contraction were exponentially related to endurance time ( r 2 = 0.68 and r 2 = 0.64, respectively), whereas the change in MAP was linearly related to target force ( r 2 = 0.51). The difference in fatigability of men and women when performing a submaximal contraction was related to the absolute contraction intensity and was limited by mechanisms that were distal to the activation of muscle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2686

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
Hunter, S. K., & Enoka, R. M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
2686-2694
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W1901324775
Cited by
354
References
6
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex differences in the fatigability of arm muscles depends on absolute force during isometric contractions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2686
The paper
Hunter, S. K., & Enoka, R. M. (2001). Sex differences in the fatigability of arm muscles depends on absolute force during isometric contractions. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2686

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.