Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sweat rate prediction equations for outdoor exercise with transient solar radiation

Gonzalez, Richard R., Cheuvront, Samuel N., Ely, Brett R., Moran, Daniel S., Hadid, Amir, Endrusick, Thomas L., Sawka, Michael N.·2012·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

We investigated the validity of employing a fuzzy piecewise prediction equation (PW) [Gonzalez et al. J Appl Physiol 107: 379–388, 2009] defined by sweat rate (m sw, g·m−2·h−1) = 147 + 1.527·(E req) − 0.87·(E max), which integrates evaporation required (E req) and the maximum evaporative capacity of the environment (E max). Heat exchange and physiological responses were determined throughout the trials. Environmental conditions were ambient temperature (T a) = 16–26°C, relative humidity (RH) = 51–55%, and wind speed ( V) = 0.5–1.5 m/s. Volunteers wore military fatigues [clothing evaporative potential (i m/clo) = 0.33] and carried loads (15–31 kg) while marching 14–37 km over variable terrains either at night ( N = 77, trials 1–5) or night with increasing daylight ( N = 33, trials 6 and 7). PW was modified ( Ṗw,sol) for transient solar radiation (R sol, W) determined from measured solar loads and verified in trials 6 and 7. PW provided a valid m sw prediction during night trials ( 1–5) matching previous laboratory values and verified by bootstrap correlation (r bs of 0.81, SE ± 0.014, SEE = ± 69.2 g·m−2·h−1). For trials 6 and 7, E req and E max components included R sol applying a modified equation Ṗw,sol, in which m sw = 147 + 1.527·(E req,sol) − 0.87·(E max). Linear prediction of m sw = 0.72· Ṗw,sol + 135 ( N = 33) was validated ( R 2 = 0.92; SEE = ±33.8 g·m−2·h−1) with PW β-coefficients unaltered during field marches between 16°C and 26°C T a for m sw ≤ 700 g·m−2·h−1. PW was additionally derived for cool laboratory/night conditions (T a < 20°C) in which E req is low but E max is high, as: PW,cool (g·m−2·h−1) = 350 + 1.527·E req − 0.87·E max. These sweat prediction equations allow valid tools for civilian, sports, and military medicine communities to predict water needs during a variety of heat stress/exercise conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.01056.2011

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 1993, Fundamentals Handbook: Physiological Principles, Comfort, Health
  2. Arens E, 1986, ASHRAE Trans
  3. Blanchard LA, 2008, Comparison of USARIEM Heat Strain Decision Aid, Mobile Heat Stress Monitor, and Existing Army Guidelines for Warm Weather Training
  4. 10.1152/jappl.1971.31.5.659 · DOI
  5. 10.1152/jappl.1979.46.3.522 · DOI
  6. Carter R, NATO Research and Technology Organization HFM-086 Symposium on “Maintaining Hydration: Issues, Guidelines, and Delivery.”
  7. 10.1007/s00421-007-0492-x · DOI
  8. Departments of the Army and Air Force, 2003, Heat Stress Control and Heat Casualty Management
  9. Department of Defense, 1992, Management of Land-Based Water Resources in Support of Contingency Operations
  10. Directorate of Combat Developments, 1999, Water Consumption Planning Factors
  11. Dupont FJ, NATO Research and Technology Organization HFM-086 Symposium on “Maintaining Hydration: Issues, Guidelines, and Delivery.”
  12. Efron B, 1990, Jackknife After Bootstrap Standard Errors and Influence Factors
  13. Fanger PO, 1972, Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering
  14. 10.1152/jappl.1967.23.2.248 · DOI
  15. Gagge AP, 1996, Handbook of Physiology: Environmental Physiology, 45
  16. 10.1016/B978-0-12-044020-7.50011-8 · DOI
  17. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00089.2009 · DOI
  18. 10.1152/jappl.1966.21.1.93 · DOI
  19. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00612.2007 · DOI
  20. Institute of Medicine, 2005, Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate
  21. Kakitsuba N, 1988, Aviat Space Environ Med, 59, 49
  22. Kolka MA, 2003, Aviat Space Environ Med, 74, 242
  23. 10.1016/S0306-4565(97)00031-4 · DOI
  24. 10.21236/ADA395136 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/978-1-4613-8122-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1152/jappl.1969.26.5.616 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1093/milmed/164.7.502 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/BF00636625 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0010-4825(86)90001-6 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/01621459.1984.10478083 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.matcom.2008.11.014 · DOI
  32. Santee WR, 2003, Load Carriage Development and Testing with Field Data
  33. Sawka MN, 1988, Human Performance Physiology and Medicine at Terrestrial Extremes, 227
  34. Sawka MN, 1988, Human Performance Physiology and Medicine at Terrestrial Extremes, 97
  35. 10.1301/nr.2005.jun.S30-S39 · DOI
  36. 10.1214/aos/1176344136 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1007/BF00421168 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/00140139508925164 · DOI
  39. 10.1097/00003677-200301000-00007 · DOI
  40. 10.1023/A:1014077330409 · DOI
  41. 10.3844/ajassp.2009.1191.1198 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s00484-010-0371-8 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gonzalez, R. R., Cheuvront, S. N., Ely, B. R., Moran, D. S., Hadid, A., Endrusick, T. L., & Sawka, M. N.
Affiliations
  • Biology Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico;
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts; and
  • Heller Institute of Medical Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer;
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2012-04-15
Volume
112
Issue
8
Pages
1300-1310
ISSN
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
Cited by
41
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.