Cited by 299Thermoregulation and physiological responsesEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Individualized model of human thermoregulation for the simulation of heat stress response

Havenith, George·2001·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

A population-based dynamic model of human thermoregulation was expanded with control equations incorporating the individual person's characteristics (body surface area, mass, fat%, maximal O 2 uptake, acclimation). These affect both the passive (heat capacity, insulation) and active systems (sweating and skin blood flow function). Model parameters were estimated from literature data. Other data, collected for the study of individual differences {working at relative or absolute workloads in hot-dry [45°C, 20% relative humidity (rh)], warm-humid [35°C, 80% rh], and cool [21°C, 50% rh] environments}, were used for validation. The individualized model provides an improved prediction [mean core temperature error, −0.21 → −0.07°C ( P< 0.001); mean squared error, 0.40 → 0.16°C, ( P < 0.001)]. The magnitude of improvement varies substantially with the climate and work type. Relative to an empirical multiple-regression model derived from these specific data sets, the analytical simulation model has between 54 and 89% of its predictive power, except for the cool climate, in which this ratio is zero. In conclusion, individualization of the model allows improved prediction of heat strain, although a substantial error remains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.5.1943

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing thermophysiological models do not incorporate physiological or psychological adaptive mechanisms.

    “while the existing thermophysiological models offer the potential to look at differences due to physiological characteristics (either metabolic heat production, body composition or thermoregulatory function) [27,28]; they do not incorporate physiological or psychological adaptive mechanisms.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Havenith, G.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Havenith, George
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2001-05-01
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
1943-1954
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2253010661
Cited by
299
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
human thermoregulation, heat stress, heat strain, sweating, skin blood flow, body surface area, body fat percentage, VO2max, acclimation, individual differences, hot arid climate, hot and humid climate, cool climate, heat capacity, thermal insulation
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Adipose Tissue, Body Temperature Regulation, Hot Temperature, Humans, Humidity, Models, Biological, Physical Fitness, Regression Analysis, Stress, Physiological, Temperature, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review