The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Six sessions of sprint interval training increases muscle oxidative potential and cycle endurance capacity in humans
Abstract
Parra et al. ( Acta Physiol. Scand 169: 157–165, 2000) showed that 2 wk of daily sprint interval training (SIT) increased citrate synthase (CS) maximal activity but did not change “anaerobic” work capacity, possibly because of chronic fatigue induced by daily training. The effect of fewer SIT sessions on muscle oxidative potential is unknown, and aside from changes in peak oxygen uptake (V̇o 2 peak), no study has examined the effect of SIT on “aerobic” exercise capacity. We tested the hypothesis that six sessions of SIT, performed over 2 wk with 1–2 days rest between sessions to promote recovery, would increase CS maximal activity and endurance capacity during cycling at ∼80% V̇o 2 peak. Eight recreationally active subjects [age = 22 ± 1 yr; V̇o 2 peak = 45 ± 3 ml·kg−1·min−1 (mean ± SE)] were studied before and 3 days after SIT. Each training session consisted of four to seven “all-out” 30-s Wingate tests with 4 min of recovery. After SIT, CS maximal activity increased by 38% (5.5 ± 1.0 vs. 4.0 ± 0.7 mmol·kg protein−1·h−1) and resting muscle glycogen content increased by 26% (614 ± 39 vs. 489 ± 57 mmol/kg dry wt) (both P < 0.05). Most strikingly, cycle endurance capacity increased by 100% after SIT (51 ± 11 vs. 26 ± 5 min; P < 0.05), despite no change in V̇o 2 peak. The coefficient of variation for the cycle test was 12.0%, and a control group ( n = 8) showed no change in performance when tested ∼2 wk apart without SIT. We conclude that short sprint interval training (∼15 min of intense exercise over 2 wk) increased muscle oxidative potential and doubled endurance capacity during intense aerobic cycling in recreationally active individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
Enhanced sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+release following intermittent sprint training
Ørtenblad, N., Lunde, P. K., Levin, K., Andersen, J. L., & Pedersen, P. K. (2000) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.2000.279.1.r152 · Cited by 114
Importance of muscle phosphocreatine during intermittent maximal cycling
Trump, M. E., Heigenhauser, G. J., Putman, C. T., & Spriet, L. L. (1996) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1996.80.5.1574 · Cited by 92 · cited 1×
“Given the significant contribution from aerobic energy metabolism during repeated sprinting (3, 26, 29, 40), it is not surprising that an increase in muscle oxidative potential, as indicated by changes in the maximal activities of “marker” enzymes such as citrate synthase, has been reported after 6–8 wk of sprint trai…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease
Gibala, M. J., Little, J. P., MacDonald, M. J., & Hawley, J. A. (2012) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.224725 · Cited by 1,744
Self-citationBurgomaster, K. A., Howarth, K. R., Phillips, S. M., Rakobowchuk, M., MacDonald, M. J., McGee, S. L., & Gibala, M. J. (2008) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142109 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationGibala, M. J., Little, J. P., Van Essen, M., Wilkin, G. P., Burgomaster, K. A., Safdar, A., Raha, S., & Tarnopolsky, M. A. (2006) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.112094 · Cited by 1,082
Self-citationGibala, M. J., & McGee, S. L. (2008) · Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1097/jes.0b013e318168ec1f · Cited by 682
Self-citationBartlett, J. D., Close, G. L., MacLaren, D. P. M., Gregson, W., Drust, B., & Morton, J. P. (2011) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2010.545427 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgomaster, K. A., Hughes, S. C., Heigenhauser, G. J. F., Bradwell, S. N., & Gibala, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1985-1990
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2112814147
- Cited by
- 856
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 37.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.