The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atrophic rhinitis: a CFD study of air conditioning in the nasal cavity
Abstract
Atrophic rhinitis is a chronic disease of the nasal mucosa. The disease is characterized by abnormally wide nasal cavities, and its main symptoms are dryness, crusting, atrophy, fetor, and a paradoxical sensation of nasal congestion. The etiology of the disease remains unknown. Here, we propose that excessive evaporation of the mucous layer is the basis for the relentless nature of this disease. Airflow and water and heat transport were simulated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques. The nasal geometry of an atrophic rhinitis patient was acquired from computed tomography scans before and after a procedure to narrow the nasal cavity. Simulations of air conditioning in the atrophic nose were compared with similar computations performed within the nasal geometries of four healthy humans. The excessively wide cavity of the patient generated abnormal flow patterns, which led to abnormal patterns of water fluxes across the wall. Geometrically, the atrophic nose had a much lower surface area than the healthy nasal passages, which increased water fluxes per unit area. Nevertheless, the simulations indicated that the atrophic nose did not condition inspired air as effectively as the healthy geometries. These simulations of water transport in the nasal cavity are consistent with the hypothesis that excessive evaporation of mucus plays a key role in the pathophysiology of atrophic rhinitis. We conclude that the main goals of a surgery to treat atrophic rhinitis should be 1) to restore the original surface area of the nose, 2) to restore the physiological airflow distribution, and 3) to create symmetric cavities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atrophic Rhinitis: A Review of 242 Cases
Moore, E. J., & Kern, E. B. (2001) · American Journal of Rhinology · doi:10.1177/194589240101500601 · Cited by 223
Cited by
Air-conditioning in the human nasal cavity
Elad, D., Wolf, M., & Keck, T. (2008) · Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.resp.2008.05.002 · Cited by 193
Surgery of the turbinates and “empty nose” syndrome
Scheithauer, M. O. (2010) · German Medical Science GMS Publishing House · doi:10.3205/cto000067 · Cited by 121
Kimbell, J. S., Frank, D. O., Laud, P., Garcia, G. J. M., & Rhee, J. S. (2013) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.007 · Cited by 119
Self-citationRhinitis in the geriatric population
Pinto, J. M., & Jeswani, S. (2010) · Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1186/1710-1492-6-10 · Cited by 59
Wakayama, T., Suzuki, M., & Tanuma, T. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150951 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcia, G. J. M., Bailie, N., Martins, D. A., & Kimbell, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1082-1092
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2051596208
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atrophic rhinitis: a CFD study of air conditioning in the nasal cavity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/japplphysiol.01118.2006
- The paper
- Garcia, G. J. M., Bailie, N., Martins, D. A., & Kimbell, J. S. (2007). Atrophic rhinitis: a CFD study of air conditioning in the nasal cavity. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01118.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.