The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of controlling shear rate on flow-mediated dilation responses in the brachial artery of humans
Abstract
The reactive hyperemia test (RHtest) evokes a transient increase in shear stress as a stimulus for endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation (EDFMD). We developed a noninvasive method to create controlled elevations in brachial artery (BA) shear rate (SR, estimate of shear stress), controlled hyperemia test (CHtest), and assessed the impact of this vs. the RHtest approach on EDFMD. Eight healthy subjects participated in two trials of each test on 3 separate days. For the CHtest, SR was step increased from 8 to 50 s−1, created by controlled release of BA compression during forearm heating. For the RHtest, transient increases in SR were achieved after 5 min of forearm occlusion. BA diameter and blood flow velocity (ultrasound) were measured upstream of compression and occlusion sites. Both tests elicited significant dilation (RHtest: 6.33 ± 3.12%; CHtest: 3.00 ± 1.05%). The CHtest resulted in 1) reduced between-subject SR and EDFMD variability vs. the RHtest [SR coefficient of variation (CV): 4.9% vs. 36.6%; EDFMD CV: 36.16% vs. 51.80%] and 2) virtual elimination of the impact of BA diameter on the peak EDFMD response (peak EDFMD vs. baseline diameter for RHtest, r 2 = 0.64, P < 0.01, vs. CHtest, r 2 = 0.14, P < 0.01). Normalization of the RHtest EDFMD response to the magnitude of the SR stimulus eliminated test differences in between-subject response variability. Reductions in trial-to-trial and day-to-day SR variability with the CHtest did not reduce EDFMD variability. Between-subject SR variability contributes to EDFMD variability with the RHtest. SR controls with the CHtest or RHtest response normalization are essential for examining EDFMD between groups differing in baseline arterial diameter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis
Celermajer, D. S., Sorensen, K. E., Gooch, V. M., Spiegelhalter, D. J., Miller, O. I., Sullivan, I. D., Lloyd, J. K., & Deanfield, J. E. (1992) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)93147-f · Cited by 4,742
Close Relation of Endothelial Function in the Human Coronary and Peripheral Circulations
Anderson, T. J., Uehata, A., Gerhard, M. D., Meredith, I. T., Knab, S., Delagrange, D., Lieberman, E. H., Ganz, P., Creager, M. A., Yeung, A. C., et al. (1995) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(95)00327-4 · Cited by 2,033 · cited 2×
“The response in peripheral conduit arteries is well correlated with the coronary response in humans (1, 33).”
BackgroundResult
Cited by
Effect of exercise training on endothelium‐derived nitric oxide function in humans
Green, D. J., Maiorana, A., O'Driscoll, G., & Taylor, R. (2004) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.068197 · Cited by 1,040
Jones, H., Green, D. J., George, K., & Atkinson, G. (2010) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00442.2009 · Cited by 85
Vascular Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, and Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease
Nowak, K. L., Jovanovich, A., Farmer-Bailey, H., Bispham, N., Struemph, T., Malaczewski, M., Wang, W., & Chonchol, M. (2020) · Kidney360 · doi:10.34067/kid.0000962019 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Pyke, K. E., Dwyer, E. M., & Tschakovsky, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 499-508
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2098817685
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.