Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 674

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional Properties of Brain Areas Associated With Motor Execution and Imagery

Hanakawa, Takashi, Immisch, Ilka, Toma, Keiichiro, Dimyan, Michael A., Van Gelderen, Peter, Hallett, Mark·2003·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Imagining motor acts is a cognitive task that engages parts of the executive motor system. While motor imagery has been intensively studied using neuroimaging techniques, most studies lack behavioral observations. Here, we used functional MRI to compare the functional neuroanatomy of motor execution and imagery using a task that objectively assesses imagery performance. With surface electromyographic monitoring within a scanner, 10 healthy subjects performed sequential finger-tapping movements according to visually presented number stimuli in either a movement or an imagery mode of performance. We also examined effects of varied and fixed stimulus types that differ in stimulus dependency of the task. Statistical parametric mapping revealed movement-predominant activity, imagery-predominant activity, and activity common to both movement and imagery modes of performance (movement-and-imagery activity). The movement-predominant activity included the primary sensory and motor areas, parietal operculum, and anterior cerebellum that had little imagery-related activity (−0.1 ∼ 0.1%), and the caudal premotor areas and area 5 that had mild-to-moderate imagery-related activity (0.2 ∼ 0.7%). Many frontoparietal areas and posterior cerebellum demonstrated movement-and-imagery activity. Imagery-predominant areas included the precentral sulcus at the level of middle frontal gyrus and the posterior superior parietal cortex/precuneus. Moreover, activity of the superior precentral sulcus and intraparietal sulcus areas, predominantly on the left, was associated with accuracy of the imagery task performance. Activity of the inferior precentral sulcus (area 6/44) showed stimulus-type effect particularly for the imagery mode. A time-course analysis of activity suggested a functional gradient, which was characterized by a more “executive” or more “imaginative” property in many areas related to movement and/or imagery. The results from the present study provide new insights into the functional neuroanatomy of motor imagery, including the effects of imagery performance and stimulus-dependency on brain activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00132.2002

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 674

Metadata

Authors
Hanakawa, T., Immisch, I., Toma, K., Dimyan, M. A., Van Gelderen, P., & Hallett, M.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2003-02-01
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
989-1002
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2159472083
Cited by
674
References
12
FWCI
11.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Properties of Brain Areas Associated With Motor Execution and Imagery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.00132.2002
The paper
Hanakawa, T., Immisch, I., Toma, K., Dimyan, M. A., Van Gelderen, P., & Hallett, M. (2003). Functional Properties of Brain Areas Associated With Motor Execution and Imagery. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00132.2002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.