The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates
Open accessAbstract
Acoustic overexposure can cause a permanent loss of auditory nerve fibers without destroying cochlear sensory cells, despite complete recovery of cochlear thresholds ( Kujawa and Liberman 2009 ), as measured by gross neural potentials such as the auditory brainstem response (ABR). To address this nominal paradox, we recorded responses from single auditory nerve fibers in guinea pigs exposed to this type of neuropathic noise (4- to 8-kHz octave band at 106 dB SPL for 2 h). Two weeks postexposure, ABR thresholds had recovered to normal, while suprathreshold ABR amplitudes were reduced. Both thresholds and amplitudes of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions fully recovered, suggesting recovery of hair cell function. Loss of up to 30% of auditory-nerve synapses on inner hair cells was confirmed by confocal analysis of the cochlear sensory epithelium immunostained for pre- and postsynaptic markers. In single fiber recordings, at 2 wk postexposure, frequency tuning, dynamic range, postonset adaptation, first-spike latency and its variance, and other basic properties of auditory nerve response were all completely normal in the remaining fibers. The only physiological abnormality was a change in population statistics suggesting a selective loss of fibers with low- and medium-spontaneous rates. Selective loss of these high-threshold fibers would explain how ABR thresholds can recover despite such significant noise-induced neuropathy. A selective loss of high-threshold fibers may contribute to the problems of hearing in noisy environments that characterize the aging auditory system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Maladaptive plasticity in tinnitus — triggers, mechanisms and treatment
Shore, S. E., Roberts, L. E., & Langguth, B. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.12 · Cited by 474
Sensory neuron diversity in the inner ear is shaped by activity
Shrestha, B. R., Chia, C., Wu, L., Kujawa, S. G., Liberman, M. C., & Goodrich, L. V. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.007 · Cited by 432
Self-citationKnipper, M., Van Dijk, P., Nunes, I., Rüttiger, L., & Zimmermann, U. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.08.002 · Cited by 309
Al‐Moyed, H., Cepeda, A. P., Jung, S., Moser, T., Kügler, S., & Reisinger, E. (2019) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201809396 · Cited by 230
Ma, K., Wang, F., Song, X., Yang, H., Gao, X., Zhu, Y., Fu, B., She, X., & Cui, B. (2026) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.70368 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Furman, A. C., Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2013-08-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 577-586
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1987022414
- Cited by
- 761
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.00164.2013
- The paper
- Furman, A. C., Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2013). Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00164.2013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.