CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contribution of blood oxygen and carbon dioxide sensing to the energetic optimization of human walking

Wong, Jeremy D., O’Connor, Shawn M., Selinger, Jessica C., Donelan, J. Maxwell·2017·Journal of Neurophysiology
DOI 10.1152/jn.00195.2017
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Human gait adaptation implies that the nervous system senses energetic cost, yet this signal is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that the blood gas receptors sense cost for gait optimization by controlling blood O 2 and CO 2 with step frequency as people walked. At the simulated energetic minimum, ventilation and perceived exertion were lowest, yet subjects preferred walking at their original frequency. This suggests that blood gas receptors are not critical for sensing cost during gait.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00195.2017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wong et al. (2017) found that subjects ignored blood gas receptor information and walked with their normal step frequencies when blood gas concentrations were experimentally manipulated.

    “They experimentally manipulated blood gas (O 2 and CO 2 ) concentrations and found that their subjects ignored the blood gas receptor information and walked with their normal step frequencies.”

    From Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics? (2019) · cites this paper as Wong et al., 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Alexander RM, 1996, Optima for Animals
  2. 10.1038/35088155 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2012.05681.x · DOI
  4. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00462.2010 · DOI
  5. 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.213769 · DOI
  6. 10.1115/1.1392310 · DOI
  7. Barfield W, 1995, Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design, 473, 10.1093/oso/9780195075557.001.0001 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)64013-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nn.2229 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2279 · DOI
  11. 10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1164/rccm.201207-1278ED · DOI
  13. 10.1152/jappl.1977.42.2.300 · DOI
  14. 10.1098/rspb.2009.0664 · DOI
  15. 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009498 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF00421087 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/JES.0b013e3182724bb0 · DOI
  18. 10.1098/rsif.2008.0415 · DOI
  19. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1761 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90206-1 · DOI
  21. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.245506 · DOI
  22. 10.1152/jappl.1993.75.3.1385 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.175.4028.1382 · DOI
  24. 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014548 · DOI
  25. Heymans JF, 1927, Arch Int Pharmacodyn, 33, 273
  26. 10.1098/rspb.1938.0050 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1249/00005768-199310000-00012 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.04.024 · DOI
  29. 10.1152/jappl.1985.59.2.459 · DOI
  30. Jones NL, 1979, J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol, 47, 954
  31. 10.1152/jappl.1982.53.3.644 · DOI
  32. 10.1056/NEJM197111112852002 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/icb/icn057 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0034-5687(75)90069-9 · DOI
  35. 10.1098/rspb.2011.2015 · DOI
  36. 10.1146/annurev.ph.45.030183.001305 · DOI
  37. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00274.2016 · DOI
  38. 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007305 · DOI
  39. 10.1242/jeb.105270 · DOI
  40. Pandolf KB, 1977, J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol, 43, 577
  41. 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80107-3 · DOI
  42. Prilutsky BI, 2001, J Exp Biol, 204, 2277, 10.1242/jeb.204.13.2277 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)62850-2 · DOI
  44. Ralston HJ, 1958, Int Z Angew Physiol, 17, 277
  45. 10.1016/0034-5687(77)90069-X · DOI
  46. 10.1152/jappl.1990.68.4.1727 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/BF00428965 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/ajpa.1330520113 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Schmidt-Nielsen K, 1997, Animal Physiology: Adaptation and Environment, 10.1017/9780511801822 · DOI
  50. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00445.2014 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.016 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Severinghaus JW, 1978, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl, 70, 188
  53. Simonson DC, 1990, Am J Physiol, 258, E399, 10.1152/ajpcell.1990.258.3.C399 · DOI
  54. 10.1113/expphysiol.2005.032367 · DOI
  55. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00536.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01156.2011 · DOI
  57. Sutton R, 1984, Temporal Credit Assignment in Reinforcement Learning University of Massachusetts (PhD thesis)
  58. 10.1242/jeb.000950 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Wasserman DH, 1983, J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol, 54, 587
  60. 10.1152/jappl.1975.39.3.354 · DOI
  61. 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.2.236 · DOI
  62. Whipp BJ, 1979, Med Sci Sports, 11, 204
  63. 10.1136/bjsm.32.3.199 · DOI
  64. 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004437 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wong, J. D., O’Connor, S. M., Selinger, J. C., & Donelan, J. M.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
118
Issue
2
Pages
1425-1433
ISSN
  • 0022-3077
  • 1522-1598
DOI
10.1152/jn.00195.2017
Cited by
23
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (5552)
  • Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • DOD | Army Research Office (W911NF-13-1-0268)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review