Cutaneous afferent innervation of the human foot sole: what can we learn from single-unit recordings?
Open accessAbstract
Cutaneous afferents convey exteroceptive information about the interaction of the body with the environment and proprioceptive information about body position and orientation. Four classes of low-threshold mechanoreceptor afferents innervate the foot sole and transmit feedback that facilitates the conscious and reflexive control of standing balance. Experimental manipulation of cutaneous feedback has been shown to alter the control of gait and standing balance. This has led to a growing interest in the design of intervention strategies that enhance cutaneous feedback and improve postural control. The advent of single-unit microneurography has allowed the firing and receptive field characteristics of foot sole cutaneous afferents to be investigated. In this review, we consolidate the available cutaneous afferent microneurographic recordings from the foot sole and provide an analysis of the firing threshold, and receptive field distribution and density of these cutaneous afferents. This work enhances the understanding of the foot sole as a sensory structure and provides a foundation for the continued development of sensory augmentation insoles and other tactile enhancement interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent study estimated that around 1,700 tactile afferents innervate the plantar surface of a single foot.
“A recent study estimated that around 1,700 tactile afferents innervate the plantar surface of a single foot (Strzalkowski et al. 2018).”
From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Strzalkowski et al. 2018
The foot sole numbers are higher than an earlier estimate provided by Strzalkowski et al. (2018).
“These numbers are higher than an earlier estimate provided by Strzalkowski et al. (2018)”
From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Strzalkowski et al. (2018)
The size of receptive fields on the foot sole has mean values of 76 mm2 for SAI, 248 mm2 for SAII, 81 mm2 for FAI, and 873 mm2 for FAII fibers.
“The size of the receptive fields varies considerably for the different tactile fibers and across different foot areas with a mean value of 76 mm 2 for the SAI fibers, 248 mm 2 for SAII fibers, 81 mm 2 for FAI fibers, and 873 mm 2 for FAII fibers.”
From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Strzalkowski et al. 2018
Cites
Johansson, R. S. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012411 · Cited by 430 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Fast- and slowly adapting cutaneous afferents are further classified as type I (FAI and SAI) or type II (FAII and SAII) based primarily on their receptive field characteristics (Johansson 1978; Vallbo and Johansson 1984).”
BackgroundTouch is a team effort: interplay of submodalities in cutaneous sensibility
Saal, H. P., & Bensmaia, S. J. (2014) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.012 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Muniak, M. A., Ray, S., Hsiao, S. S., Dammann, J. F., & Bensmaia, S. J. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1486-07.2007 · Cited by 235 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Previous work in animals (Bensmaïa et al. 2005; Muniak et al. 2007; Phillips and Johnson 1981; Pubols et al. 1971; Werner and Mountcastle 1965) and the human hand (Condon et al. 2014; Hallin et al. 2002; Johansson and Vallbo 1979a; Johansson et al. 1982; Knibestöl and Vallbo 1970) has led to the…”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tactile innervation densities across the whole body
Corniani, G., & Saal, H. P. (2020) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00313.2020 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Sensory feedback for limb prostheses in amputees
Raspopovic, S., Valle, G., & Petrini, F. M. (2021) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-021-00966-9 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
- Authors
- Strzalkowski, N. D. J., Peters, R. M., Inglis, J. T., & Bent, L. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Bent, Leah R.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2018-09-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1233-1246
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- PMC
- PMC6171067
- OpenAlex
- W2806004721
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Mount Royal University Institutional Repository (Mount Royal University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Keywords
- cutaneous afferents, foot sole, low-threshold mechanoreceptors, receptive fields, postural control, standing balance, gait, tactile feedback, proprioception
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Postural Balance, Foot, Humans, Mechanoreceptors, Microelectrodes, Physical Stimulation, Sensory Thresholds, Touch, Feedback, Physiological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review