Cited by 235Tactile and Sensory InteractionsNeural dynamics and brain functionIon Channels and Receptors

The neural coding of stimulus intensity: linking the population response of mechanoreceptive afferents with psychophysical behavior

Open access
Muniak, Michael A., Ray, Supratim, Hsiao, Steven S., Dammann, J. Frank, Bensmaia, Sliman J.·2007·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

How specific aspects of a stimulus are encoded at different stages of neural processing is a critical question in sensory neuroscience. In the present study, we investigated the neural code underlying the perception of stimulus intensity in the somatosensory system. We first characterized the responses of SA1 (slowly adapting type 1), RA (rapidly adapting), and PC (Pacinian) afferents of macaque monkeys to sinusoidal, diharmonic, and bandpass noise stimuli. We then had human subjects rate the perceived intensity of a subset of these stimuli. On the basis of these neurophysiological and psychophysical measurements, we evaluated a series of hypotheses about which aspect(s) of the neural activity evoked at the somatosensory periphery account for perception. We evaluated three types of neural codes. The first consisted of population codes based on the firing rate of neurons located directly under the probe. The second included population codes based on the firing rate of the entire population of active neurons. The third included codes based on the number of active afferents. We found that the response evoked in the localized population is logarithmic with stimulus amplitude (given a constant frequency composition), whereas the population response across all neurons is linear with stimulus amplitude. We conclude that stimulus intensity is best accounted for by the firing rate evoked in afferents located under or near the locus of stimulation, weighted by afferent type.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1486-07.2007

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the intact nerve, increases in pressure result in both an increase in the number of recruited fibers and an increase in the firing rates of those fibers already recruited.

    “In the intact nerve, increases in pressure result in both an increase in the number of recruited fibers and an increase in the firing rates of those fibers already recruited (Muniak et al., 2007), which explains why changes in either the delivered charge or the stimulation frequencies result in changes in perceived pressure.”

    From Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface (2015) · cites this paper as Muniak et al., 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muniak, M. A., Ray, S., Hsiao, S. S., Dammann, J. F., & Bensmaia, S. J.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2007-10-24
Volume
27
Issue
43
Pages
11687-11699
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1989489753
Cited by
235
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS-38034)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC000095, DC-00023, DC-00095, T32DC000023)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 38034, NS-18787, R01NS018787, P01NS038034)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
neural coding, somatosensory system, rapidly adapting afferents, Pacinian corpuscles, population coding, firing rate, psychophysics, macaque, sinusoidal stimuli, bandpass noise
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Adult, Animals, Differential Threshold, Female, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Male, Mechanoreceptors, Neurons, Afferent, Physical Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Touch, Vibration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review