The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of Macaque Behavior and Superior Colliculus Neuronal Activity to Predictions From Models of Two-Choice Decisions
Abstract
Recently, models in psychology have been shown capable of accounting for the full range of behavioral data from simple two-choice decision tasks: mean reaction times for correct and error responses, accuracy, and the reaction time distributions for correct and error responses. At the same time, recent data from neural recordings have allowed investigation of the neural systems that implement such decisions. In the experiment presented here, neural recordings were obtained from superior colliculus prelude/buildup cells in two monkeys while they performed a two-choice task that has been used in humans for testing psychological models of the decision process. The best-developed psychological model, the diffusion model, and a competing model, the Poisson counter model, were explicitly fit to the behavioral data. The pattern of activity shown in the prelude/buildup cells, including the point at which response choices were discriminated, was matched by the evidence accumulation process predicted from the diffusion model using the parameters from the fits to the behavioral data but not by the Poisson counter model. These results suggest that prelude/buildup cells in the superior colliculus, or cells in circuits in which the superior colliculus cells participate, implement a diffusion decision process or a variant of the diffusion process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex
Platt, M. L., & Glimcher, P. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22268 · Cited by 1,721
Roitman, J. D., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-21-09475.2002 · Cited by 1,589 · cited 2×
“Roitman and Shadlen (2002) argue for a similar evidence accumulation process to that presented in this article.”
BackgroundModeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067 · Cited by 1,478
Self-citationSpeed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics
Wickelgren, W. A. (1977) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9 · Cited by 1,304 · cited 2×
“The LATER model account would also produce no growth of accuracy in experimental paradigms in which subjects are required to respond at experimenter determined times in the response signal procedure (e.g., Dosher 1976; Ratcliff 1978; Reed 1976; Wickelgren 1977).”
MethodNeural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque
Kim, J.-N., & Shadlen, M. N. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/5739 · Cited by 950
Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196302 · Cited by 838
Self-citationModulation of Neuronal Activity in Superior Colliculus by Changes in Target Probability
Basso, M. A., & Wurtz, R. H. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-18-07519.1998 · Cited by 474
The influence of urgency on decision time
Reddi, B. A. J., & Carpenter, R. H. S. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77739 · Cited by 411
Separate Signals for Target Selection and Movement Specification in the Superior Colliculus
Horwitz, G. D., & Newsome, W. T. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5417.1158 · Cited by 346
Dynamics of neuronal responses in macaque MT and VIP during motion detection
Cook, E. P., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn924 · Cited by 289
Cited by
Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 · Cited by 4,472
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 · Cited by 3,059
Self-citationDecision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus–norepinephrine system
Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510 · Cited by 1,678
Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history
Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 · Cited by 1,630
“Many studies have established relationships between diffusion models and neurophysiological measures such as single cell recordings in rodents and monkeys [52,88,105,143–148], EEG [42,43,149,150], fMRI [42,43,139,151–155], transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) [156], and transcranial alternating current stimulation…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ratcliff, R., Cherian, A., & Segraves, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1392-1407
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2101254766
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Macaque Behavior and Superior Colliculus Neuronal Activity to Predictions From Models of Two-Choice Decisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.01049.2002
- The paper
- Ratcliff, R., Cherian, A., & Segraves, M. (2003). A Comparison of Macaque Behavior and Superior Colliculus Neuronal Activity to Predictions From Models of Two-Choice Decisions. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01049.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.