The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lesions of an Avian Basal Ganglia Circuit Prevent Context-Dependent Changes to Song Variability
Abstract
Trial-by-trial variability is important in feedback-based motor learning. Variation in motor output enables evaluation mechanisms to differentially reinforce patterns of motor activity that produce desired behaviors. Here, we studied neural substrates of variability in the performance of adult birdsong, a complex, learned motor skill used for courtship. Song performance is more variable when male birds sing alone (undirected) than when they sing to females (directed). We test the role of the anterior forebrain pathway (AFP), an avian basal ganglia–forebrain circuit, in this socially driven modulation of song variability. We show that lesions of the lateral magnocellular nucleus of the anterior nidopallium (LMAN), the output nucleus of the AFP, cause a reduction in the moment-by-moment variability in syllable structure during undirected song to the level present during directed song. This elimination of song modulation is immediate and long-lasting. We further show that the degree of syllable variability and its modulation are both attenuated in older birds, in concert with decreased variability of LMAN activity in these birds. In contrast to the requirement of LMAN for social modulation of syllable structure, we find that LMAN is not required for modulation of other features of song, such as the number of introductory elements and motif repetitions and the ordering of syllables or for other motor and motivational aspects of courtship. Our findings suggest that a key function of avian basal ganglia circuitry is to regulate vocal performance and plasticity by specifically modulating moment-by-moment variability in the structure of individual song elements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
(2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2004.842673 · Cited by 24,496
YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music
de Cheveigné, A., & Kawahara, H. (2002) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1458024 · Cited by 1,920
Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius
Nottebohm, F., Stokes, T. M., & Leonard, C. M. (1976) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901650405 · Cited by 1,643
Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms
Doupe, A. J., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567 · Cited by 1,633
Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei
Reiner, A., Perkel, D. J., Bruce, L. L., Butler, A. B., Csillag, A., Kuenzel, W., Medina, L., Paxinos, G., Shimizu, T., Striedter, G., et al. (2004) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20118 · Cited by 1,148
Scharff, C., & Nottebohm, F. (1991) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.11-09-02896.1991 · Cited by 923
The zebra finch: a synthesis of field and laboratory studies
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-5095 · Cited by 912
Forebrain Lesions Disrupt Development But Not Maintenance of Song in Passerine Birds
Bottjer, S. W., Miesner, E. A., & Arnold, A. P. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6719123 · Cited by 827
The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis Of Field And Laboratory Studies
Zann, R. A. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198540793.001.0001 · Cited by 789
Temporal Hierarchical Control of Singing in Birds
Yu, A. C., & Margoliash, D. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5283.1871 · Cited by 608
Cited by
Habits, Rituals, and the Evaluative Brain
Graybiel, A. M. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112851 · Cited by 1,697
Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of ‘crystallized’ adult birdsong
Tumer, E. C., & Brainard, M. S. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06390 · Cited by 448
Self-citationSocial context-induced song variation affects female behavior and gene expression
Woolley, S. C., & Doupe, A. J. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060062 · Cited by 303
Sleep, off-line processing, and vocal learning
Margoliash, D., & Schmidt, M. F. (2010) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.09.005 · Cited by 105
Aronov, D., Veit, L., Goldberg, J. H., & Fee, M. S. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3009-11.2011 · Cited by 64
“Consistent with this idea, single-neuron recordings in LMAN suggest that this area is active throughout subsong (Aronov et al., 2008), plastic song (Ölveczky et al., 2005), and even adult song (Kao and Brainard, 2006).”
Result
Metadata
- Authors
- Kao, M. H., & Brainard, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1441-1455
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2147712684
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lesions of an Avian Basal Ganglia Circuit Prevent Context-Dependent Changes to Song Variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.01138.2005
- The paper
- Kao, M. H., & Brainard, M. S. (2006). Lesions of an Avian Basal Ganglia Circuit Prevent Context-Dependent Changes to Song Variability. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01138.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.