Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 604

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics

Fernandez, C., Goldberg, J. M.·1976·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. The discharge of peripheral otolith neurons in response to sinusoidal force variations was investigated in the barbiturate-anesthetized squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). The sine waves were superimposed on a background force which biased the end organ so as to excite or inhibit the unit's firing. Both regularly and irregularly discharging neurons were studied. 2. The response amplitude, measured as a peak-to-peak changes in firing rate, reached near-maximal values during the first sine-wave cycle and, for most units, remained constant as sinusoidal stimulation was prolonged. 3. In regular units, introduction of an excitatory bias increased the sensitivity to sinusoidal stimulation in a manner consistent with the static asymmetries observed in the response to constant forces. Bias effects in irregular units were usually small and, in some cases, excitatory biases resulted in a decrease in sensitivity. 4. Variation in sine-wave amplitude had no effect on the sinusoidal gains or phases of regular units. For irregular units, there was some evidence of a small gain increase as stimulus amplitude decreased. 5. Nonlinear distortion was usually 10-20% and was mainly of an asymmetric type. In regular units, the distortion could be partially related to static asymmetries. 6. The response of regular units is predominantly tonic, that of irregular units more phasic. For regular units there was usually no more than a twofold gain enhancement as frequency was increased in the spectrum from DC to 2.0 Hz; typically, small phase leads at low frequencies were replaced by similar phase lags at higher frequencies. Irregular units were characterized by a 20-fold frequency-dependent gain enhancement over the same spectrum; phase leads of 20-40% were seen. 7. Bodeplots were fit by a family of transfer functions, each consisting of three terms. The first is a velocity-sensitive operator with a fractional exponent. The second is a low-frequency adaptation operator. Only the lag operator can be related to the dynamics of otoligh motion. Most of the variations among units, including those seen between regular and irregular units, can be accounted for by suitable variations in the velocity-sensitive and adaptation operators. 8. The transfer functions, when integrated and inverted, led to reasonable approximations of the response to force trapezoids. It is concluded that the transfer functions provide an adequate representation of the dynamic behavior of most units. The only exceptions are the few neurons showing delayed adaptation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1976.39.5.996

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 604

Metadata

Authors
Fernandez, C., & Goldberg, J. M.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1976-09-01
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
996-1008
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2183855172
Cited by
604
References
0
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1976.39.5.996
The paper
Fernandez, C., & Goldberg, J. M. (1976). Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1976.39.5.996

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.