The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Properties and tectal projections of monkey retinal ganglion cells
Abstract
1. Extracellular single-unit recordings were undertaken in the retina of the rhesus monkey in order to assess the receptive-field properties of those ganglion cells which project to the superior colliculus. Cells were tested for antidromic activation from the superior colliculus, lateral geniculate nucleus, and the optic chiasm. 2. The majority of retinal ganglion cells could be classified as color opponent or broad band. A small, heterogeneous group could not be so classified and were collectively referred to as "rarely encountered" cells. 3. Color-opponent cells responded in a sustained fashion and broad-band cells in a transient fashion to visual stimuli. Quantitative assessment of response transiency shows that this measure reliably differentiates these two classes. 4. To moving sinusoidal gratings broad-band cells responded more vigorously and with greater temporal modulation than did color-opponent cells. 5. The distributions of conduction velocities of different classes of neurons showed considerable overlap. On the average, axons of broadband neurons conducted most rapidly and rarely encountered types, most slowly. 6. The population of cells projecting to the superior colliculus does not contain color-opponent cells. The retinotectal cells respond predominantly in a transient fashion. Only 3.9% of broad-band cells (26 of 663) were antidromically driven from the superior colliculus, while 29% of the rarely encountered group (5 of 17) could be so activated. 7. The relative distribution of color-opponent and broad-band cells does not appear to change with retinal eccentricity within the central 20 degrees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear
Morris, J. S., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1680 · Cited by 1,349
To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia
Stein, J. (1997) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(96)01005-3 · Cited by 1,236
Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals
Tamietto, M., & de Gelder, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2889 · Cited by 1,042
Visual-Motor Function of the Primate Superior Colliculus
Wurtz, R. H., & Albano, J. E. (1980) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.03.030180.001201 · Cited by 904
The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity.
Kaplan, E., & Shapley, R. M. (1986) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.83.8.2755 · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- Schiller, P. H., & Malpeli, J. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1977-03-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 428-445
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1961840981
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Properties and tectal projections of monkey retinal ganglion cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1977.40.2.428
- The paper
- Schiller, P. H., & Malpeli, J. G. (1977). Properties and tectal projections of monkey retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1977.40.2.428
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.