The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Responses to head tilt in cat central vestibular neurons. I. Direction of maximum sensitivity
Abstract
Responses to head tilt were recorded from vestibular neurons in and around the lateral vestibular nucleus (LVN) of the decerebrate cat. Each animal had all six semicircular canals rendered nonfunctional by a plugging procedure. Each cell was studied by slowly tilting the cat, using one or both of two paradigms. In the first method, sinusoidal tilts (0.05 or 0.1 Hz) were used to produce bidirectional stimuli in up to 12 pairs of directions, including left/right (roll tilt) and fore/aft (pitch). The second method imposed a constant 10 degree tilt; the direction of the tilt was rotated around the animal by an appropriate combination of roll and pitch motions. Neurons responded by maximally increasing their discharge frequency in a particular direction of head tilt from the horizontal. Each cell's response could be described by a vector in the animal's horizontal plane whose orientation is given by the direction of the most effective stimulus and whose length represents the neuron's maximal sensitivity to tilt. The two methods of stimulation yielded equivalent response vectors. Response vectors were obtained for 100 neurons. The distribution of vector directions for these vestibular neurons was not uniform; there was a conspicuous absence of neurons with fore/aft-directed vectors. The sensitivity of these cells (length of the response vector) ranged from 10 to 230 impulses X s-1 X g-1 (median 50). Neurons whose vectors lay in the ipsilateral half-plane (which would be excited by ear-down tilt) tended to be less sensitive than those with contralateral vectors. Neurons excited by ear-up tilt tended to be located ventrally in the LVN, while those excited by ear-down tilt were more evenly distributed. There was no other obvious correlation of vector orientation with the anatomical locus of the cell in the LVN. The directional selectivity of the responses of these neurons to head tilts are similar to those previously reported tin utricular afferents. The broad distribution of response vector orientations provides an appropriate substrate for vestibulospinal reflexes to a wide variety of head tilts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neural Mechanisms for Forming a Perceptual Decision
Salzman, C. D., & Newsome, W. T. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8146653 · Cited by 301
Yates, B. J., Catanzaro, M. F., Miller, D. J., & McCall, A. A. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-3937-6 · Cited by 90
Jian, B. J., Shintani, T., Emanuel, B. A., & Yates, B. J. (2002) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1042-8 · Cited by 72
Central Vestibular Tuning Arises from Patterned Convergence of Otolith Afferents
Liu, Z., Kimura, Y., Higashijima, S.-I., Hildebrand, D. G. C., Morgan, J. L., & Bagnall, M. W. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.08.019 · Cited by 50
Suzuki, T., Sugiyama, Y., & Yates, B. J. (2012) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00680.2011 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Schor, R. H., Miller, A. D., & Tomko, D. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1984-01-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 136-146
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1821008591
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responses to head tilt in cat central vestibular neurons. I. Direction of maximum sensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1984.51.1.136
- The paper
- Schor, R. H., Miller, A. D., & Tomko, D. L. (1984). Responses to head tilt in cat central vestibular neurons. I. Direction of maximum sensitivity. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1984.51.1.136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.