Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Activity-dependent disinhibition. I. Repetitive stimulation reduces IPSP driving force and conductance in the hippocampus in vitro

Thompson, S. M., Gahwiler, B. H.·1989·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. Intracellular recording techniques were used to investigate the mechanisms underlying the activity-dependent lability of inhibitory synaptic potentials indirectly evoked in CA3 pyramidal neurons by stimulation of the mossy fiber afferent pathway in organotypic slice cultures of hippocampus. 2. Repetitive stimulation (3-10 Hz, 30-60 s) was found to reduce the amplitude of the inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) and occasionally lead to repetitive, epileptiform discharge. 3. Under single-electrode voltage-clamp, the current underlying the inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSC) was found to have the same reversal potential (EIPSC) as the response to iontophoretically applied gamma-aminobutyric acid (EGABA), and both were blocked by bicuculline. Reducing the extracellular Cl- concentration from 153 to 89 mM shifted EGABA in the depolarizing direction by 9 mV from -64.7 to -55.6 mV, an amount close to that predicted by the Nernst equation. We therefore presume that the IPSC is mediated by GABA and that the reversal potentials of both are equal to ECl-. 4. Under single-electrode voltage-clamp, repetitive stimulation (3-10 Hz, 30-60 s) was found to cause a mean decrease in the conductance underlying the IPSC (gIPSC) of 22%. This decrease was independent of the membrane potential at which stimuli were delivered. 5. Under single-electrode voltage-clamp, repetitive stimulation (3-10 Hz, 30-60 s) was found to cause a 2-8 mV depolarizing shift in EIPSC when the membrane potential was held constant 5-15 mV depolarized from EIPSC. The mean decrease in IPSC driving force was 49%. If membrane potential was held 10-20 mV hyperpolarized from EIPSC, there was no change in driving force. 6. Currents activated by iontophoretically applied GABA were decreased in amplitude following repetitive stimulation at depolarized, but not hyperpolarized, holding potentials. 7. The decrease in IPSC driving force following repetitive stimulation at depolarized holding potentials was less after decreasing the extracellular K+ concentration from 5.8 to 1 mM. 8. We conclude that the decrease in driving force following repetitive stimulation results from an increase in the intracellular Cl- concentration, and that the activity-dependent decrease in gIPSC results from a decrease in presynaptic release rather than from postsynaptic receptor desensitization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1989.61.3.501

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, S. M., & Gahwiler, B. H.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1989-03-01
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
501-511
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2239183276
Cited by
318
References
0
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity-dependent disinhibition. I. Repetitive stimulation reduces IPSP driving force and conductance in the hippocampus in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1989.61.3.501
The paper
Thompson, S. M., & Gahwiler, B. H. (1989). Activity-dependent disinhibition. I. Repetitive stimulation reduces IPSP driving force and conductance in the hippocampus in vitro. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1989.61.3.501

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.