Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey

Tanaka, K., Fukada, Y., Saito, H. A.·1989·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. The dorsal part of medial superior temporal area (MST) has two unique types of visually responsive cells: 1) expansion/contraction cells, which selectively respond to either an expansion or a contraction; and 2) rotation cells, which selectively respond to either a clockwise or a counterclockwise rotation. In addition to selectivity for the mode of motion, both types of cells respond preferentially to movements over a wide field rather than over a small field. With the aim of understanding the underlying mechanisms of these selectivities, we carried out experiments on immobilized monkeys anesthetized with N2O. 2. Expansion/contraction and rotation of a pattern extending over a wide field contain three stimulus factors: 1) the spatial arrangement of different directions of movement, 2) the gradient in the speed of regional movement from the center to the periphery of the stimulus, and 3) the size change of texture components of the pattern in the expansion/contraction and the acceleration of movement of texture components toward the center of the stimulus in the rotation. The contribution of each factor to the activation of the cells was evaluated by comparing the response before and after removing the factor from the stimulus. The moving stimuli that lacked one or two of the factors were produced by the use of a cinematographic animation technique. 3. Withdrawal of the first factor, the spatial arrangement of different directions of movement, reduced the response of both Expansion/contraction and Rotation cells much more severely than either of the other two factors. We concluded that the first factor is far more important for activation than the other two. 4. These results are consistent with the model that Expansion/contraction and Rotation cells receive converging inputs from many directional cells with relatively small receptive fields in different parts of the visual field. Because MST receives strong fiber projections from MT, MT cells are candidates for the input cells. According to the model, if the convergence is organized so that the preferred directions of the input cells are arranged radially, the target cell will be an Expansion/contraction cell; if the input cells are arranged circularly, a Rotation cell will result.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1989.62.3.642

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Tanaka, K., Fukada, Y., & Saito, H. A.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1989-09-01
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
642-656
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2466391925
Cited by
358
References
0
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1989.62.3.642
The paper
Tanaka, K., Fukada, Y., & Saito, H. A. (1989). Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1989.62.3.642

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.