The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli
Abstract
1. The activity of single neurons was recorded in Macaca mulatta monkeys while they performed tasks requiring them to select a cued stimulus from an array of three to eight stimuli and report the orientation of that stimulus. Stimuli were presented in a circular array centered on the fixation target and scaled to place a single stimulus element within the receptive field of the neuron under study. The timing of the cuing event permitted the directing of visual attention to the spatial location of the correct stimulus before its presentation. 2. The effects of focal attention were examined in cortical visual areas V1, V2, and V4, where a total of 672 neurons were isolated with complete studies obtained for 94 V1, 74 V2, and 74 V4 neurons with receptive-field center eccentricities in the range 1.8-8 degrees. Under certain conditions, directed focal attention results in changes in the response of V1, V2, and V4 neurons to otherwise identical stimuli at spatially specific locations. 3. More than one-third of the neurons in each area displayed differential sensitivity when attention was directed toward versus away from the spatial location of the receptive field just before and during stimulus presentation. Both relative increases and decreases in neural activity were observed in association with attention directed at receptive-field stimuli. 4. The presence of multiple competing stimuli in the visual field was a major factor determining the presence or absence of differential sensitivity. About two-thirds of the neurons that were differentially sensitive to the attending condition in the presence of competing stimuli were not differentially sensitive when single stimuli were presented in control studies. For V1 and V2 neurons the presence of only a few (3-4) competing stimuli was sufficient for a majority of the neurons studied; a majority of the V4 neurons required six to eight stimuli in the array before significant differences between attending conditions occurred. 5. For V1 and V2 neurons the neuronal sensitivity differences between attending conditions were observed primarily at or near the peak of the orientation tuning sensitivity for each neuron; the differences were evident over a broader range of orientations in V4 neurons. 6. In conclusion, neural correlates of focal attentive processes can be observed in visual cortical processing in areas V1 and V2 as well as area V4 under conditions that require stimulus feature analysis and selective spatial processing within a field of competing stimuli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A feature-integration theory of attention.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 · Cited by 12,366
Circular Statistics in Biology
Watson, G. S., & Batschelet, E. (1982) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267831 · Cited by 4,587
Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.
Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.95.1.15 · Cited by 2,257
Selective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (2003) · Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2834.003.0024 · Cited by 2,144
Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey
Knierim, J. J., & van Essen, D. C. (1992) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1992.67.4.961 · Cited by 1,043
Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention
Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(89)90144-2 · Cited by 1,034
Preattentive processing in vision
Treisman, A. (1985) · Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/s0734-189x(85)80004-9 · Cited by 935
Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects.
Treisman, A. (1982) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.8.2.194 · Cited by 907
Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays
Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212870 · Cited by 585
Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination
Bergen, J. R., & Julesz, B. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/303696a0 · Cited by 490
Cited by
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI
Logothetis, N. K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06976 · Cited by 3,612
Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention
Fries, P., Reynolds, J. H., Rorie, A. E., & Desimone, R. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1055465 · Cited by 2,786
Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations?
Singer, W. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1 · Cited by 2,581
Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex
Ungerleider, S. K. A. L. G. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315 · Cited by 2,159
Metadata
- Authors
- Motter, B. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1993-09-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 909-919
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1853938811
- Cited by
- 1,049
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 14.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1993.70.3.909
- The paper
- Motter, B. C. (1993). Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1993.70.3.909
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.