Cited by 110Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Cortical Plasticity, Excitatory–Inhibitory Balance, and Sensory Perception

Open access
Carcea, Ioana, Froemke, Robert C.·2013·Progress in Brain Research

Abstract

Experience shapes the central nervous system throughout life. Structural and functional plasticity confers a remarkable ability on the brain, allowing neural circuits to adequately adapt to dynamic environments. This process can require selective adjustment of many excitatory and inhibitory synapses in an organized manner, in such a way as to enhance representations of behaviorally important sensory stimuli while preserving overall network excitability. The rules and mechanisms that orchestrated these changes across different synapses and throughout neuronal ensembles are beginning to be understood. Here, we review the evidence connecting synaptic plasticity to functional plasticity and perceptual learning, focusing on the roles of various neuromodulatory systems in enabling plasticity of adult neural circuits. However, the challenge remains to appropriately leverage these systems and forms of plasticity to persistently improve perceptual abilities and behavioral performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-444-63327-9.00003-5

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carcea, I., & Froemke, R. C.
Affiliations
NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Froemke, Robert C.
Venue
Progress in Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2013
Volume
207
Pages
65-90
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2416819300
Cited by
110
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
15.43
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (K99DC009635, R00DC009635, R01DC012557)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
cortical plasticity, excitation-inhibition balance, sensory perception, perceptual learning, synaptic plasticity, functional plasticity, neuromodulatory systems, network excitability, experience-dependent brain development
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Learning, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Somatosensory Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review