The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dopaminergic modulation of glutamate-induced excitations of neurons in the neostriatum and nucleus accumbens of awake, unrestrained rats
Abstract
1. Single-unit recording and iontophoresis were used in awake, unrestrained rats to assess the action of dopamine (DA) and glutamate (GLU) on the spontaneous activity of neurons in the neostriatum and nucleus accumbens. 2. A total of 88 neurons (40 neostriatal and 48 accumbal) was recorded from 7 rats during 13 recording sessions. During quiet rest, spontaneously active neurons discharged at a slow rate and irregular pattern of activity. Accumbal neurons had a significantly faster level of basal activity than neostriatal neurons (modal values of 10.3 vs. 2.1 imp/s, respectively). 3. Neuronal responses to separate applications of DA and GLU (5-80 nA; 15-30 s) were tested on 40 and 76 units (195 and 227 applications), respectively, during the quiet resting period. The effect of prolonged DA iontophoresis (5-80 nA; 2-3 min) on GLU-induced changes in impulse activity was tested on 38 units (72 applications). 4. GLU activated all cells in both structures. This response appeared with a latency of 0.5-4.0 s at different ejection currents (5-40 nA; mean threshold of 22.2 nA) and was highly variable (103-11,520% of basal activity). Response magnitude correlated strongly with the rate of basal activity (r = 0.822). 5. DA inhibited 75% of spontaneously active neostriatal and accumbal cells with a mean threshold of 20.4 nA. In contrast to the GLU excitation, the DA-induced inhibition was relatively weak in magnitude (10-90% of basal activity) and occurred with relatively longer on- and offset latencies than GLU (2-20 s). The inhibitory effect of DA was absent during phasic activations of neuronal activity associated with movement. Two neostriatal neurons responded to DA with a dose-dependent excitation. 6. Prolonged DA iontophoresis altered both basal impulse activity (causing a decrease in 36 of 72 applications and an increase in 4) and the magnitude of the GLU-induced activation (decreasing it in 27 of 72 applications and increasing it in 12). The net result was an overall enhancement of the GLU response relative to the DA-induced change in basal activity (74% of cases). This increase in the GLU response occurred at relatively low DA ejection currents (10-30 nA). It was stronger in the nucleus accumbens than in the neostriatum and was most evident on cells having both a moderate level of basal activity and a relatively small initial response to GLU. When DA was ejected at high currents (> 40 nA) and/or the magnitude of the preceding GLU-induced activation was high (> 800% of basal activity), DA tended to decrease the GLU response. 7. DA appears to exert a slight depression of striatal and accumbal activity, which has the effect of amplifying the phasic activation induced by GLU. Because forebrain DA release occurs in response to behaviorally important stimuli, the DA-induced modulation of the GLU response may play an important role in regulating goal-directed behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug dependence
Koob, G. F., & Bloom, F. E. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2903550 · Cited by 2,070
Responses of midbrain dopamine neurons to behavioral trigger stimuli in the monkey
Schultz, W. (1986) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1986.56.5.1439 · Cited by 390
Schultz, W., & Romo, R. (1990) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1990.63.3.607 · Cited by 334
Neuronal activity in monkey striatum related to the expectation of predictable environmental events
Apicella, P., Scarnati, E., Ljungberg, T., & Schultz, W. (1992) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1992.68.3.945 · Cited by 305
Cited by
Goldstein, R. Z., & Volkow, N. D. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1642 · Cited by 2,667
The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex
Seamans, J. K., & Yang, C. R. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.05.006 · Cited by 1,592
Subsecond dopamine release promotes cocaine seeking
Phillips, P. E. M., Stuber, G. D., Heien, M. L. A. V., Wightman, R. M., & Carelli, R. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01476 · Cited by 1,113
The Nucleus Accumbens: An Interface Between Cognition, Emotion, and Action
Floresco, S. B. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115159 · Cited by 938
Dopaminergic modulation of neuronal excitability in the striatum and nucleus accumbens
Nicola, S. M., Surmeier, D. J., & Malenka, R. C. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.185 · Cited by 931
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiyatkin, E. A., & Rebec, G. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 142-153
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2418050700
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dopaminergic modulation of glutamate-induced excitations of neurons in the neostriatum and nucleus accumbens of awake, unrestrained rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1996.75.1.142
- The paper
- Kiyatkin, E. A., & Rebec, G. V. (1996). Dopaminergic modulation of glutamate-induced excitations of neurons in the neostriatum and nucleus accumbens of awake, unrestrained rats. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1996.75.1.142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.