The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4).
Abstract
1. We studied the functional properties of neurons in the caudal part of inferior area 6 (area F4) in awake monkeys. In agreement with previous reports, we found that the large majority (87%) of neurons responded to sensory stimuli. The responsive neurons fell into three categories: somatosensory neurons (30%); visual neurons (14%); and bimodal, visual and somatosensory neurons (56%). Both somatosensory and bimodal neurons typically responded to light touch of the skin. Their RFs were located on the face, neck, trunk, and arms. Approaching objects were the most effective visual stimuli. Visual RFs were mostly located in the space near the monkey (peripersonal space). Typically they extended in the space adjacent to the tactile RFs. 2. The coordinate system in which visual RFs were coded was studied in 110 neurons. In 94 neurons the RF location was independent of eye position, remaining in the same position in the peripersonal space regardless of eye deviation. The RF location with respect to the monkey was not modified by changing monkey position in the recording room. In 10 neurons the RF's location followed the eye movements, remaining in the same retinal position (retinocentric RFs). For the remaining six neurons the RF organization was not clear. We will refer to F4 neurons with RF independent of eye position as somatocentered neurons. 3. In most somatocentered neurons (43 of 60 neurons) the background level of activity and the response to visual stimuli were not modified by changes in eye position, whereas they were modulated in the remaining 17. It is important to note that eye deviations were constantly accompanied by a synergic increase of the activity of the ipsilateral neck muscles. It is not clear, therefore, whether the modulation of neuron discharge depended on eye position or was a consequence of changes in neck muscle activity. 4. The effect of stimulus velocity (20-80 cm/s) on neuron response intensity and RF extent in depth was studied in 34 somatocentered neurons. The results showed that in most neurons the increase of stimulus velocity produced an expansion in depth of the RF. 5. We conclude that space is coded differently in areas that control somatic and eye movements. We suggest that space coding in different cortical areas depends on the computational necessity of the effectors they control.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is possible that bimodal and multimodal cells in premotor and posterior parietal areas could play important roles by mediating critical multisensory integration [7], [41], [42], [43], [47].”
From If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping (2008) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“they contain many neurons that integrate visual, tactile and proprioceptive information in head and body-part centred reference frames [7], [41], [42], [43], [47].”
From If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping (2008) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“These areas are part of a system that controls actions”
From If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping (2008) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 691
Peri-hand space expands beyond reach in the context of walk-and-reach movements
Berger, M., Neumann, P., & Gail, A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39520-8 · Cited by 13
Functional Lateralization of the Mirror Neuron System in Monkey and Humans
Errante, A., & Fogassi, L. (2021) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym13010077 · Cited by 16
“This finding is reinforced by the neuronal response obtained during active movements [31,45].”
BackgroundSelf-citationHarvey, M., Gilchrist, I. D., Olk, B., et al. (2003) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00291-9 · Cited by 16
“[4] on the other hand, although also arguing for a representational failure, link it instead to changes in neurones in areas F4 [8], area 6[11] and especially area V6 (PO) [10] in the visual dorsal stream.”
Miyata, K., Yamamoto, T., Fukunaga, M., Sugawara, S. K., & Sadato, N. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex Communications · doi:10.1093/texcom/tgac014 · Cited by 18
“In contrast, PMv neurons respond to somatosensory stimuli applied to either the face or the arm and to visual stimuli corresponding to peripersonal stimuli (Fogassi et al. 1996; Graziano et al. 1997).”
BackgroundThéodoridou, Z. D., & Triarhou, L. C. (2011) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.01.001 · Cited by 14
Tactile representation of the head and shoulders assessed by fMRI in the nonhuman primate
Wardak, C., Guipponi, O., Pinède, S., & Hamed, S. B. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00633.2015 · Cited by 14
“Tactile responses in the ventral premotor cortex (PMv; areas F4 and F5) have already been described, with receptive fields preferentially located on the face, near the mouth, and on the hand (Fogassi et al. 1996; Gentilucci et al. 1988; Rizzolatti et al. 1981).”
BackgroundFossataro, C., Bruno, V., Gindri, P., & Garbarini, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02458 · Cited by 15
“This, added to the fact that the firing rate of the multimodal neurons in both areas (Rizzolatti et al., 1981a,b; Graziano and Gross, 1993; Fogassi et al., 1996; Duhamel et al., 1998; Graziano, 1999; Graziano et al., 2000) increases as more visuo-tactile stimuli approach the face, leads to propose…”
BackgroundForsberg, A., O’Dowd, A., & Gherri, E. (2019) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.03.020 · Cited by 18
Posterior parietal networks encoding visual space
Galletti, C., & Fattori, P. (2002) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508335.003.0004 · Cited by 15
Zschorlich, V. R., Behrendt, F., & de Lussanet, M. H. E. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11020187 · Cited by 16
“In this context, it has been found that the core part of the cortex involved in the encoding process of the peripersonal space is premotor area F4 [78].”
BackgroundA normative model of peripersonal space encoding as performing impact prediction
Straka, Z., Noel, J., & Hoffmann, M. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010464 · Cited by 14
“For instance, stimuli looming toward the body enhance tactile sensitivity at the spatial and temporal location where observers expect impact to occur [9], and PPS enlarges as the speed of incoming stimuli grows [10].”
BackgroundInfluentialKerr, C. E. (2008) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.12.2.205 · Cited by 16
“The neural substrate supporting this direct perceptual mechanism is called the “mirror neuron” system that has recently been discovered in monkeys and humans (Buccino et al., 2001; Fadiga, Fogassi, Pavesi, & Rizzolatti, 1995; Fogassi et al., 1996; Iacoboni & Dapretto, 2006; Rizzolatti, Fadiga, Gallese et al., 1996; Ri…”
BackgroundA brief review of the role of training in near-tool effects
Brown, L. E., & Goodale, M. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00576 · Cited by 17
“…putamen, and the intraparietal sulcus, have overlapping visual and tactile receptive fields (vRFs and tRFs, respectively), typically on the face or hand (Rizzolatti et al., 1981a,b; Graziano and Gross, 1993; Graziano et al., 1994; Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano, 1999; Graziano and Gandhi, 2000).”
Smith, A. J. T. (2009) · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · Cited by 15
Sambo, C. F., & Förster, B. (2011) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.233 · Cited by 14
“Accordingly, neurophysiological research in animals has identified a network of cortical and subcortical brain areas, including the ventral premotor cortex, the posterior parietal cortex, the putamen, and the superior colliculus, that subserves the visuotactile representation of peripersonal space [1, 4, 5, 7].”
Distant heterotopic callosal connections to premotor cortex in non-human primates
Lanz, F., Moret, V., Ambett, R., Cappe, C., Rouiller, E. M., & Loquet, G. (2016) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.035 · Cited by 14
“…movement [Boussaoud, 1985]/guiding reaching area [Cisek and Kalaska, 2005]) and in F4/F5 (sensory guidance of movement [Graziano et al., 1994] and peripersonal space [Fogassi et al., 1996]/hand shaping during grasping, vocalization [Coudè et al., 2011] and mirror neurons [Kohler et al., 2002]).”
Mangalam, M., Cutts, S. A., & Fragaszy, D. M. (2019) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-019-05645-5 · Cited by 14
The Body in a Multisensory World
Heed, T., & Röder, B. (2011) · Frontiers in neuroscience · doi:10.1201/b11092-35 · Cited by 18
“Touched” by Light: Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to Visuo-Haptic Stimuli in Peri-Personal Space
Simon-Dack, S. L., Cummings, S. E., Reetz, D., Alvarez-Vazquez, E., Gu, H., & Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A. (2009) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0096-3 · Cited by 14
“Similar bimodal neurons have been reported in the premotor cortex and the putamen (Graziano et al. 1994; Fogassi et al. 1996; Duhamel et al. 1998).”
Teramoto, W., Honda, K., Furuta, K., & Sekiyama, K. (2017) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-017-4975-7 · Cited by 14
“Fogassi et al. (1996) reported that the visual receptive fields of visuotactile neurons in area F4 expanded with an approaching visual object’s increasing velocity.”
BackgroundGrasping actions and social interaction: neural bases and anatomical circuitry in the monkey
Rozzi, S., & Coudé, G. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00973 · Cited by 14
On the contributions of vision and proprioception to the representation of hand-near targets
Brown, L. E., Marlin, M. C., & Morrow, S. A. (2014) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00005.2014 · Cited by 13
Ramírez-Pedraza, R., Vargas, N., Sandoval, C., del Valle‐Padilla, J. L., & Ramos, F. (2019) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.10.006 · Cited by 13
Erro, R., Marotta, A., & Fiorio, M. (2020) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02119-7 · Cited by 14
“…has been hidden; Obayashi, Tanaka, & Iriki, 2000), and that their visual receptive fields are anchored to the hand and extend into the space adjacent to the skin surface (i.e., perihand space) up to 40 cm (Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano & Gross, 1996; Graziano et al., 1997; Guterstam et al., 2016).”
BackgroundGeyer, S., Luppino, G., & Rozzi, S. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374236-0.10027-6 · Cited by 15
Self-citationLiu, Y., Denton, J. M., & Nelson, R. J. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0052-8 · Cited by 13
“Some neurons in supplementary motor area and premotor area fire when stimuli of each of the three modalities are presented; however, they may fire preferentially for one or more of them (Fogassi et al. 1996; Gentilucci et al. 1988; Graziano and Gandhi 2000; Graziano et al. 1997, 1999; Kurata and Tanji 1986; Rizzolatti…”
BackgroundYoshino, K., Kawagishi, S., Takatsuki, Y., et al. (2000) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(99)02198-8 · Cited by 13
Motor functions of the Brocas region
Binkofski, F., & Buccino, G. (2004) · Cited by 13
Investigating multisensory spatial cognition through the phenomenon of extinction
Farnè, A., Brozzoli, C., Làdavas, E., & Ro, T. (1993) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231447.003.0009 · Cited by 14
“…neurons with small visual RFs (~30 cm), a differential rate of firing occurs for stimuli within the animal's reach (Graziano and Gross, 1995; Fogassi et al., 1996; Duhamel et al., 1998), thus coding for the limited portion of space immediately surrounding the body (i.e. near peripersonal…”
BackgroundBrain Mechanisms for Synthesizing Information from Different Sensory Modalities
Stein, B. E., Wallace, M. T., & Stanford, T. R. (2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470753477.ch22 · Cited by 13
Architectural experience influences the processing of others’ body expressions
Presti, P., Galasso, G. M., Ruzzon, D., Avanzini, P., Caruana, F., Rizzolatti, G., & Vecchiato, G. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2302215120 · Cited by 14
Self-citationA behavioural experiment in virtual reality to verify the role of action function in space coding
Gamberini, L., Carlesso, C., Seraglia, B., & Craighero, L. (2013) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.840348 · Cited by 11
“Two are the main circuits involved in this type of coding: the LIP-FEF, devoted to the movement programming of the eyes (Barash, Bracewell, Fogassi, Gnadt, & Andersen, 1991); and the VIP-F4 dedicated to the encoding of movements of head, arm and hand (Fogassi et al., 1996).”
MethodBottini, G., Karnath, H. ‐., Vallar, G., Sterzi, R., Frith, C., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Paulesu, E. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(01)92457-7 · Cited by 12
Filbrich, L., Halicka, M., Alamia, A., & Legrain, V. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.11.011 · Cited by 12
Pasaye, E. H., Gutiérrez, R. A., Alcauter, S., Mercadillo, R. E., Aguilar‐Castañeda, E., Iturbe, M. D., Romero-Romo, J., & Barrios, F. A. (2010) · The Neuroradiology Journal · doi:10.1177/197140091002300604 · Cited by 11
Visual illusion in virtual world alters women?s target-directed walking
Chaudhury, S., Eisinger, J. M., Lei, H., et al. (2004) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1961-7 · Cited by 12
“…regions are activated (Weiss et al. 2000), and different coordinate systems are involved in the processing of near space compared to far space (Fogassi et al. 1996) These findings lead to the question of whether the perception/action dissociation found in nearspace tasks generalizes to action…”
BackgroundInfluentialParedes, R., Ferri, F., & Seriès, P. (2021) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2021.06.026 · Cited by 12
Tools and peripersonal space: an enactive account of bodily space
Sykes, J. J. (2023) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-023-09903-4 · Cited by 14
“PPNs are mostly found in brain area F4 and are multimodal and somatocentered (Fogassi et al., 1996).”
Lower limb peripersonal space and the desire to amputate a leg
Stone, K. D., Kornblad, C. A. E., Engel, M. M., Dijkerman, H. C., Blom, R. M., & Keizer, A. (2020) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01316-1 · Cited by 11
Resourceful Event-Predictive Inference: The Nature of Cognitive Effort
Butz, M. V. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867328 · Cited by 14
“Individual neurons were shown to encode peripersonal spaces, responding to stimuli touching or appearing close by a particular part of the hand or face (Fogassi et al., 1996; Maravita et al., 2003).”
BackgroundThe Influence of the Body and Action on Spatial Attention
Reed, C. L., Garza, J. P., & Roberts, R. J. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77343-6_3 · Cited by 11
“In macaques, bimodal visuotactile neurons are distinguished by their characteristic response properties in peripersonal space [34] [35] [36] [37] [30] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42].”
BackgroundSclafani, V., Simpson, E. A., Suomi, S. J., & Ferrari, P. F. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.002 · Cited by 11
“For example, bimodal neurons, which code for peripersonal and extrapersonal space, have been described in inferior parietal areas and the ventral premotor cortex (Duhamel et al., 1998; Fogassi et al., 1992, 1996; Graziano and Cooke, 2006; Graziano et al., 1994; Graziano and Gross, 1998).”
BackgroundSzczepanski, S. M., & Saalmann, Y. B. (2013) · BioArchitecture · doi:10.4161/bioa.27462 · Cited by 12
“VIP shares connections with area F4 of premotor cortex in the macaque,(39) which contains neurons that represent face, neck, and proximal arm movements and most likely codes peripersonal space in body- or headcentered reference frames.(48,49) In humans, resting-state functional connectivity and dMRI studies suggest a…”
BackgroundThe role of affordances in inhibition of return
Riggio, L., Patteri, I., Oppo, A., et al. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03213930 · Cited by 11
Emotional processing is enhanced in peri-hand space
Du, F., Wang, X., Abrams, R. A., & Zhang, K. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.009 · Cited by 11
“These bimodal neurons show increasing response to visual stimuli as they get closer to the hand (Foggassi et al., 1996; Graziano, Hu, & Gross, 1997).”
BackgroundBlini, E., Farnè, A., Brozzoli, C., & Hadj‐Bouziane, F. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851738.003.0003 · Cited by 11
Functional networks for peripersonal space coding and prediction of impact to the body
Cléry, J. C., & Hamed, S. B. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851738.003.0004 · Cited by 10
Neuronal activities in the ventral premotor cortex during a visually guided jaw movement in monkeys
Yoshino, K., Mikami, A., & Kubota, K. (1998) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/s0168-0102(98)00014-5 · Cited by 11
Attention and Sensorimotor Integration
Iacoboni, M. (2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012692545-6/50017-9 · Cited by 11
Agarwal, R., Thakor, N. V., Sarma, S. V., & Massaquoi, S. G. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2643-14.2015 · Cited by 10
“The known input– output connectivity of PMv supports the likelihood of converging somatosensory information from SII (directly to PMv and indirectly via AIP and ventral intraparietal area (VIP)) and visual target information from AIP (Dancause et al., 2006) and VIP (Duhamel et al., 1997).”
BackgroundAim and Plausibility of Action Chains Remap Peripersonal Space
Senna, I., Cardinali, L., Farnè, A., & Brozzoli, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01681 · Cited by 11
“…a specific body part, and by visual stimuli close to the same body part, thus promoting a body part-centered representation of the near space (e.g., Rizzolatti et al., 1981, 1988, 1997; Fogassi et al., 1992, 1996; Graziano and Gross, 1993, 1995, 1998; Graziano et al., 1994, 1997; Graziano, 1999).”
BackgroundA Neural Network Model of Multisensory Representation of Peripersonal Space: Effect of tool use
Ursino, M., Zavaglia, M., Magosso, E., Serino, A., & di Pellegrino, G. (2007) · Conference proceedings · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4352894 · Cited by 10
“The visual and tactile receptive fields (RFs) of these bimodal neurons are in spatial register, that is the visual RF matches the location of the tactile RF on the body surface, and extends in depth to the space immediately surrounding the body [3], [4].”
BackgroundApproaching stimuli bias attention in numerical space
Longo, M. R., Lourenco, S. F., & Francisco, A. J. (2012) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.04.001 · Cited by 10
“For example, Fogassi et al. (1996) described bimodal neurons in macaque premotor cortex with both tactile and visual receptive fields (RFs).”
BackgroundResultBahadori, M., Barumerli, R., Geronazzo, M., & Cesari, P. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107790 · Cited by 9
Visuospatial properties of caudal area 7b in Maca ca fascicularis
Jiang, H., Ying-Zhou, H., Wang, J., Yuan-ye, M., & Xin-Tian, H. (2013) · Zoological Research · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1141.2013.e02e50 · Cited by 10
“Most visual receptive fields encode nearby space in a body-part-centered reference frame (Fogassi et al, 1992; Fogassi et al, 1996; Gentilucci et al, 1983; Graziano et al, 1994; Graziano et al, 1997).”
BackgroundAge-related differences in sensorimotor representation of space in drawing by hand
Lepelley, M.-C., Thullier, F., Bolmont, B., & Lestienne, F. G. (2010) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.024 · Cited by 10
“…distributed representation of space can be used to elaborate a synthetic ‘‘construct” that is the representation of the body’s spatial orientation that encodes the appropriate movements (Arbib, 1991; Gurfinkel et al., 1993; Fogassi et al., 1996; Ghafouri et al., 2002). ed by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.”
MethodLohmann, J., & Butz, M. V. (2017) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-017-0798-5 · Cited by 10
“…in premotor and parietal cortical areas are responsive to nearby stimuli relative to a particular body surface, anticipate approaching stimuli, and partially relocate their receptive fields during tool usage (Canzoneri et al. 2013; Fogassi et al. 1996; Holmes and Spence 2004; Iriki et al. 1996).”
BackgroundThe Perspective from Cognitive Neuroscience
Kemmerer, D. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190682620.003.0002 · Cited by 9
A tilted frame deceives the eye and the hand
Li, W., Matin, E., Bertz, J. W., & Matin, L. (2008) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/8.16.18 · Cited by 10
“Furthermore, the visual and tactile receptive fields remain in correspondence when the arm moves, but almost all macaque bimodal units centered on the arm do not move with either the eye or the head (Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano & Gross, 1994, 1995; Graziano et al., 1997).”
BackgroundA Computational Model Of The Cortical Mechanisms Involved In Primate Grasping
Fagg, A. H. (2017) · University of Southern California Digital Library · doi:10.25549/usctheses-c20-629075 · Cited by 10
Chiarella, S. G., Pastina, R. D., Raffone, A., & Simione, L. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14040306 · Cited by 10
Self-other boundary under social threat in schizophrenia
Lee, H.-S., Sangimino, M., Baxter, T., Buck, L. E., Bodenheimer, B., & Park, S. (2024) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2024.09.018 · Cited by 10
“(Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano and Cooke, 2006; Rizzolatti et al., 1997).”
Effects of visual information on perceived posture of an experimental phantom foot
Inui, N., & Masumoto, J. (2013) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3460-1 · Cited by 9
“Electrophysiological studies at a single neuron level indicate that an interaction between vision and proprioception may change cellular discharge (Duhamel et al. 1998; Fogassi et al. 1996; for review, Graziano and Botvinick 2002).”
BackgroundSabu, R., Yasuda, K., Kato, R., Kawaguchi, S., & Iwata, H. (2020) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283111 · Cited by 9
“Damage to the posterior ventral pre-motor cortex is responsible for peripersonal neglect, while damage to the frontal field of vision is responsible for extra-personal neglect [9][10].”
BackgroundImplicit Associations between Adverbs of Place and Actions in the Physical and Digital Space
Craighero, L., & Marini, M. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11111523 · Cited by 10
“Separate networks are devoted to the movement programming of the eyes [17–19] and to the encoding of reaching movements of the head, arm, and hand [20].”
BackgroundPeripersonal space: why so last-second?
de Vignemont, F., & Farnè, A. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0159 · Cited by 12
“In these (and human-analogue) sensorimotor regions, electrophysiological studies in non-human primates [5,6,14,15,37,38] and neuroimaging work in healthy humans [27,39,40] have identified populations of neurons exhibiting multisensory processing.”
Noel, J., Blanke, O., Serino, A., & Salomon, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00072 · Cited by 9
“All participants gave informed consent prior to participation and were remunerated with 20 Swiss Francs for their time.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExpansion of space for visuotactile interaction during visually induced self-motion
Kuroda, N., & Teramoto, W. (2020) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-020-05966-w · Cited by 10
Bliss in and Out of the Body: The (Extra)Corporeal Space Is Impervious to Social Pleasant Touch
Spaccasassi, C., Frigione, I., & Maravita, A. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11020225 · Cited by 8
“Surprisingly, under specific circumstances, the visual properties of these neurons can be extended to a portion of space beyond that covered by the tactile receptive field [38].”
BackgroundFearful faces modulate spatial processing in peripersonal space: An ERP study
Ellena, G., Starita, F., Haggard, P., Romei, V., & Làdavas, E. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107827 · Cited by 10
Mirror Neurons and Mirror-Touch Synesthesia
Linkovski, O., Katzin, N., & Salti, M. (2016) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858416652079 · Cited by 9
The Neuroscience of Human Tool Use
Valyear, K. F., Fitzpatrick, A. M., & McManus, E. F. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804042-3.00112-3 · Cited by 9
Learning a Peripersonal Space Representation as a Visuo-Tactile Prediction Task
Straka, Z., & Hoffmann, M. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68600-4_13 · Cited by 8
“, [3]; [1] for a review) firing when some part of the skin is stimulated or a visual stimulus is presented nearby.”
BackgroundKarellas, A. M., Yielder, P. C., Burkitt, J. J., McCracken, H. S., & Murphy, B. A. (2019) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci9120362 · Cited by 10
“In addition to this, the premotor cortex is recognized for its involvement with responses to auditory, visual, and somatosensory inputs [52].”
BackgroundGallese, V., & Umiltà, M. A. (2002) · Neuropsychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/15294145.2002.10773377 · Cited by 9
“Cortical areas integrating multiple sensory modalities such as area VIP and sectors of area PF in the posterior parietal cortex, and area F4 in the ventral premotor cortex, code the presence of objects within a limited space sector, peripersonal space (Gentilucci et al., 1988; Fogassi et al., 1996; Rizzolatti et al.,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationBetter Vision Through Manipulation
Metta, G., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2002) · doi:10.21236/ada434728 · Cited by 9
Egocentric value maps of the near-body environment
Bufacchi, R. J., Somervail, R., Fitzpatrick, A. M., Murayama, Y., Logothetis, N. K., Caminiti, R., & Iannetti, G. D. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-025-01958-7 · Cited by 11
Comparison of peripersonal space in front and rear spaces
Teraoka, R., Kuroda, N., Kojima, R., & Teramoto, W. (2024) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-024-06782-2 · Cited by 7
“Neurophysiological studies in monkeys have shown that faster-looming stimuli elicit responses in PPS neurons at farther distances than slower stimuli (Fogassi et al. 1996).”
Extending Peri-Personal Space in Immersive Virtual Reality: A Systematic Review
Karakoc, C., Lucifora, C., Massimino, S., Nucera, S., & Vicario, C. M. (2025) · Virtual Worlds · doi:10.3390/virtualworlds4010005 · Cited by 8
“Furthermore, Fogassi et al. [12] demonstrated that the magnitude of visual receptive fields in the F4 region (premotor cortex), which is involved in defensive PPS, depends on the speed of approaching stimuli.”
Sensori-Motor Appropriation of an Artefact: A Neuroscientific Approach
Rybarczyk, Y. P., Hoppenot, P., Colle, E., & Daniel, R. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/28164 · Cited by 7
“This phenomenon can be easily explained by neurophysiological recordings in monkeys, which stress the bimodal characteristic of neurons coding the peripersonal space surrounding each part of the body and especially the hand (Fogassi et al., 1996; Grazziano & Gross, 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialVisuo-tactile predictive mechanisms of peripersonal space
Dijkerman, H. C., & Medendorp, W. P. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851738.003.0005 · Cited by 10
Coster, L. D., Sánchez-Herrero, P., López‐Moreno, J., & Tajadura‐Jiménez, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.701872 · Cited by 8
“Effects of Animation The role of the motor system in shaping and maintaining the bodily self and body ownership in particular has been welldocumented by neuroimaging studies showing the emergence of premotor cortex activity lying at the root of our body schema (Graziano et al., 1994; Fogassi et al., 1996; Ehrsson et a…”
BackgroundKuroda, N., & Teramoto, W. (2021) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-021-06269-4 · Cited by 9
Enhanced audio-tactile multisensory interaction in a peripersonal task after echolocation
Tonelli, A., Campus, C., Serino, A., & Gori, M. (2019) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-019-05469-3 · Cited by 8
Predicting Upcoming Events Occurring in the Space Surrounding the Hand
Rangel, M. L., Souza, L., Rodrigues, É. C., de Oliveira, J. M., Miranda, M. F., Galves, A., & Vargas, C. D. (2021) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2021/6649135 · Cited by 9
“These results are in accordance with the existence of a network devoted specifically to the representation of peripersonal space [13, 16, 17, 43].”
BackgroundResultProprioceptive Body Illusions Modulate the Visual Perception of Reaching Distance
Petroni, A., Carbajal, M. J., & Sigman, M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131087 · Cited by 8
“When the animal moved its body part, the auditory or visual fields accompanied the tactile receptive field, representing the visual or auditory space centered on that body part [21–27].”
Spaccasassi, C., Dijkerman, H. C., Maravita, A., Ferrante, O., & de Jong, M. C. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01749 · Cited by 8
“…the visual stimulus is closer to the body rather than far away from it, as revealed by electrophysiological studies in monkey (Graziano, Reiss, & Gross, 1999; Duhamel, Bremmer, Hamed, & Graf, 1997; Fogassi et al., 1996) as well as humans (Noel, Serino, & Wallace, 2019; Bernasconi et al., 2018).”
BackgroundThe influence of face mask on social spaces depends on the behavioral immune system
Geers, L., & Coello, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.991578 · Cited by 8
“It was conceived as an interface between the body and the environment contributing to the orientation of attention toward objects that represent potential targets for motor actions, and would thereby serve two essential functions: selecting potential actions toward incentive objects and protecting the body from threat…”
BackgroundFerroni, F., Arcuri, E., Ardizzi, M., Chinchella, N., Gallese, V., & Ciaunica, A. (2024) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218241261645 · Cited by 13
“However, here we speculate that a careful comparison between motor processes (Fogassi et al., 1992, 1996) in DP versus psychosis may reveal important differences, as demonstrated by previous studies on schizophrenia patients (see Ardizzi et al., 2020).”
Self-citationVision is biased near handheld, but not remotely operated, tools
McManus, R. R., & Thomas, L. E. (2020) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02099-8 · Cited by 6
Skillful action in peripersonal space
Jackson, G. B. (2013) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-013-9301-7 · Cited by 7
Embodied simulaton and imagery at work in hypnosis: Ericksonian psychotherapy and its uniqueness
Balugani, R. (2008) · Contemporary Hypnosis · doi:10.1002/ch.343 · Cited by 7
Aimola, L., Schindler, I., & Venneri, A. (2013) · Behavioural Neurology · doi:10.1155/2013/198460 · Cited by 8
Sandoval, C. J., & Ramos, F. (2020) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2020.11.004 · Cited by 7
Representation and Perception of the Body in Space
Bassolino, M., & Serino, A. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819641-0.00137-7 · Cited by 8
Perception of Extrapersonal Space: Psychological and Neural Aspects
Colby, C. L. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/03501-4 · Cited by 7
Evolutionary perspective on peripersonal space and perception
Froesel, M., Hamed, S. B., & Cléry, J. C. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99193-3.00009-x · Cited by 6
Visual response of ventrolateral prefrontal neurons and their behavior-related modulation
Rozzi, S., Bimbi, M., Gravante, A., Simone, L., & Fogassi, L. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-89500-0 · Cited by 6
Self-citationPeri-personal space as an interface for self-environment interaction
Noel, J., Bertoni, T., & Serino, A. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851738.003.0002 · Cited by 6
Embodied Attention: Integrating the Body and Senses to Act in the World
Reed, C. L., & Hartley, A. A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_12 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Luppino, G., Matelli, M., & Rizzolatti, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Parma (IT)
- Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Universita di Parma, Italy.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1996-07-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-157
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1785556983
- Cited by
- 688
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 29.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- peripersonal space, eye position, visual receptive fields, bimodal neurons, stimulus velocity, neck muscle activity, spatial coding, monkeys
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Cues, Depth Perception, Environment, Fixation, Ocular, Macaca nemestrina, Motion Perception, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Retina, Robotics, Somatosensory Cortex, Visual Pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review