The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4).
Abstract
1. We studied the functional properties of neurons in the caudal part of inferior area 6 (area F4) in awake monkeys. In agreement with previous reports, we found that the large majority (87%) of neurons responded to sensory stimuli. The responsive neurons fell into three categories: somatosensory neurons (30%); visual neurons (14%); and bimodal, visual and somatosensory neurons (56%). Both somatosensory and bimodal neurons typically responded to light touch of the skin. Their RFs were located on the face, neck, trunk, and arms. Approaching objects were the most effective visual stimuli. Visual RFs were mostly located in the space near the monkey (peripersonal space). Typically they extended in the space adjacent to the tactile RFs. 2. The coordinate system in which visual RFs were coded was studied in 110 neurons. In 94 neurons the RF location was independent of eye position, remaining in the same position in the peripersonal space regardless of eye deviation. The RF location with respect to the monkey was not modified by changing monkey position in the recording room. In 10 neurons the RF's location followed the eye movements, remaining in the same retinal position (retinocentric RFs). For the remaining six neurons the RF organization was not clear. We will refer to F4 neurons with RF independent of eye position as somatocentered neurons. 3. In most somatocentered neurons (43 of 60 neurons) the background level of activity and the response to visual stimuli were not modified by changes in eye position, whereas they were modulated in the remaining 17. It is important to note that eye deviations were constantly accompanied by a synergic increase of the activity of the ipsilateral neck muscles. It is not clear, therefore, whether the modulation of neuron discharge depended on eye position or was a consequence of changes in neck muscle activity. 4. The effect of stimulus velocity (20-80 cm/s) on neuron response intensity and RF extent in depth was studied in 34 somatocentered neurons. The results showed that in most neurons the increase of stimulus velocity produced an expansion in depth of the RF. 5. We conclude that space is coded differently in areas that control somatic and eye movements. We suggest that space coding in different cortical areas depends on the computational necessity of the effectors they control.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is possible that bimodal and multimodal cells in premotor and posterior parietal areas could play important roles by mediating critical multisensory integration [7], [41], [42], [43], [47].”
From If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping (2008) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“they contain many neurons that integrate visual, tactile and proprioceptive information in head and body-part centred reference frames [7], [41], [42], [43], [47].”
From If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping (2008) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“These areas are part of a system that controls actions”
From If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping (2008) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 691
When vision guides movement: a functional imaging study of the monkey brain
Gregoriou, G. G., & Savaki, H. E. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00176-9 · Cited by 34
“The intraparietal and premotor cortices are known to use visual, somatosensory, and motor information to guide the moving arm (Mountcastle et al., 1975; Bioulac and Lamarre, 1979; Hyvarinen, 1982; Kalaska et al., 1983; Georgopoulos and Massey, 1985; Colby and Duhamel, 1991; Caminiti et al., 1996; Fogassi et al., 1996;…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMarini, F., Tagliabue, C. F., Sposito, A. V., Arieta, A. H., Brugger, P., Estévez, N., & Maravita, A. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.017 · Cited by 33
“…evidence has shown that body representation is strictly linked with that of the space immediately surrounding it, the so-called peripersonal space (Fogassi et al., 1996), through the strong integration of multisensory input, in particular tactile stimuli on the skin and visual stimuli in the…”
BackgroundYamagata, T., Nakayama, Y., Tanji, J., & Hoshi, E. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00452.2009 · Cited by 35
Cortical and Thalamic Pathways for Multisensory and Sensorimotor Interplay
Cappe, C., Rouiller, E. M., & Barone, P. (2011) · Frontiers in neuroscience · doi:10.1201/b11092-4 · Cited by 48
Towards a unified perspective of object shape and motion processing in human dorsal cortex
Erlikhman, G., Caplovitz, G. P., Gurariy, G., Medina, J., & Snow, J. C. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.04.016 · Cited by 31
“The region of space around the body that lies within reach (often known as peripersonal space) is prioritized in many areas of dorsal (Duhamel, Bremmer, Ben Hamed, & Graf, 1997; Galletti, Battaglini, & Fattori, 1993) and frontal (Fogassi et al., 1996) cortex.”
Haber, S. N., & Gdowski, M. (2004) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012547626-3/50022-3 · Cited by 33
Approaching threatening stimuli cause an expansion of defensive peripersonal space
Bufacchi, R. J. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00316.2017 · Cited by 30
“Indeed, VIP neurons are highly selective to the direction and velocity of stimuli (Colby et al. 1993) and receive dense proprioceptive inputs (Lewis and Van Essen 2000), while the receptive field of many F4 neurons expands in depth when the stimulus speed increases (Fogassi et al. 1996).”
BackgroundTransfer of information by BMI
Tehovnik, E. J., Woods, L., & Slocum, W. M. (2013) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.10.003 · Cited by 32
Connectional gradients underlie functional transitions in monkey pre-supplementary motor area
Albertini, D., Gerbella, M., Lanzilotto, M., Livi, A., Maranesi, M., Ferroni, C. G., & Bonini, L. (2019) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.101699 · Cited by 32
“…regions of the premotor (F2, F3, F4 and F5), cingulate and lateral parietal/opercular cortices, which host peripersonal ((Graziano et al., 1994; Fogassi et al., 1996); see (Graziano and Cooke, 2006)), mirror ((Gallese et al., 1996; Rozzi et al., 2008; Hihara et al., 2015); see (Bonini, 2017))…”
Tool-use Extends Peripersonal Space Boundaries in Schizophrenic Patients
Ferroni, F., Ardizzi, M., Magnani, F., Ferri, F., Langiulli, N., Rastelli, F., Lucarini, V., Giustozzi, F., Volpe, R., Marchesi, C., et al. (2022) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbac067 · Cited by 32
Attention's grasp: early and late hand proximity effects on visual evoked potentials
Reed, C. L., Leland, D. S., Brekke, B., & Hartley, A. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00420 · Cited by 31
“…Graziano, 1999; Graziano and Cooke, 2006) and are located in cortical regions that support a multimodal system for upcoming action: parietal cortex, premotor cortex, and the putamen (Graziano and Gross, 1994; Fogassi et al., 1996; Duhamel et al., 1998; Graziano, 1999; Graziano and Cooke, 2006).”
BackgroundEmbodied Simulation and Touch: the Sense of Touch in Social Cognition
Gallese, V., & Ebisch, S. J. H. (2016) · Phenomenology and Mind · doi:10.13128/phe_mi-19602 · Cited by 32
“…in space perception. in particular, their rFs are anchored to a particular body part and when the body part is moved, the rF moves along with it (Fogassi et al. 1996; graziano and gross 1998). hence, it has been proposed that area F4 could be involved in the integration of multisensory…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationA close look into the near/far space division: A real-distance ERP study
Valdés, B., Sebastián, M., Hinojosa, J. A., Román, F. J., & Santaniello, G. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.009 · Cited by 33
“These cells, found in the ventral intraparietal cortex, the putamen and in a small region of the premotor area of the monkey's brain (Fogassi et al., 1996) respond to tactile, visual and auditory stimulation that takes place in so called, peripersonal space or near space.”
Ochiai, T., Mushiake, H., & Tanji, J. (2004) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh193 · Cited by 31
“…reported to reflect spatial target location (Godschalk et al., 1985; Gentilucci et al., 1988; Mushiake et al., 1997; Hoshi and Tanji, 2002), the three-dimensional shape of motor targets (Murata et al., 1997) and visual objects in the peripersonal space (Graziano et al., 1994; Fogassi et al., 1996).”
BackgroundBoudreau, M.-J., Brochier, T. G., Paré, M., & Smith, A. M. (2001) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2001.86.3.1067 · Cited by 32
“Several investigators (Fogassi et al. 1992, 1996; Graziano et al. 1994, 1997) have suggested that the location of these visual RFs is independent of eye position and that the PMv neurons encode space in a coordinate system that is not centered on the retina but rather on other body parts such as…”
BackgroundPictures, action properties and motor related effects
Ferretti, G. (2016) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1097-x · Cited by 32
“…for arm reaching (Borghi and Riggio 2015: 9).24 Thus, canonical neurons space dependency is due to the connections between area F5 and area F4 (Fogassi et al. 1996; Matelli et al. 1996; Borghi and Riggio 2015, p. 7; Costantini et al. 2011a, b).25 Accordingly, 23 See also Vainio et al. (2011),…”
BackgroundGuterstam, A., Zeberg, H., Özçiftci, V. M., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.004 · Cited by 30
“These neurons feature visual receptive fields (RFs) that extend up to 40 cm from the skin surface (Fogassi et al., 1996), that are spatially anchored to the limb (and follow changes in limb position) (Graziano, Hu, & Gross, 1997) and that are independent of the direction of gaze (Graziano & Gross,…”
InfluentialSchubotz, R. I., Sakreida, K., Tittgemeyer, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2004) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.4.638 · Cited by 32
Being-in-the-world-with: Presence Meets Social And Cognitive Neuroscience
Riva, G. (2006) · CogPrints (University of Southampton) · Cited by 32
Pasqualini, I., Llobera, J., & Blanke, O. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00354 · Cited by 30
“…sidewalls next to the participants either in extrapersonal space, i.e., beyond reach (large room-size condition), or in peripersonal space, i.e., the space surrounding the body (narrow room-size condition; Fogassi et al., 1996; Rizzolatti et al., 1997; Ladavas et al., 1998; Teneggi et al., 2013).”
BackgroundNoel, J., Serino, A., & Wallace, M. T. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01334 · Cited by 30
“The current work is centered around these neural dynamics and designed to address whether the recruitment of PPS neurons in IPS and vPM results in notable alteration of the EEG signal.”
BackgroundInfluentialTowards manipulation-driven vision
Fitzpatrick, P., & Metta, G. (2003) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/irds.2002.1041360 · Cited by 30
Moran, R., Molholm, S., Reilly, R. B., & Foxe, J. J. (2008) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06187.x · Cited by 31
Vision in the palm of your hand
Brown, L. E., Morrissey, B. F., & Goodale, M. A. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.021 · Cited by 34
What’s Coming Near? The Influence of Dynamical Visual Stimuli on Nociceptive Processing
Paepe, A. L. D., Crombez, G., & Legrain, V. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155864 · Cited by 30
“Moreover, the firing rates of some of these neurons change dynamically with stimulus velocity [14].”
Background5. Neural Mechanisms of Bodily Self-Consciousness and the Experience of Presence in Virtual Reality
Herbelin, B., Salomon, R., Serino, A., & Blanke, O. (2015) · doi:10.1515/9783110471137-005 · Cited by 39
The Evolution of Visual Cortex and Visual Systems
Lyon, D. C. (2007) · Evolution of Nervous Systems · doi:10.1016/b0-12-370878-8/00075-6 · Cited by 32
Binkofski, F., Butler, A., Buccino, G., Heide, W., Fink, G., Freund, H.-J., & Seitz, R. J. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1594-2 · Cited by 29
“In F4, the space is encoded in body-parts-centred coordinates and the visual receptive fields are also located in the peripersonal space (Grazziano et al. 1994; Fogassi et al. 1996).”
BackgroundThe Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex
Bashford, L., Rosenthal, I. A., Kellis, S., Pejsa, K., Kramer, D. R., Lee, B., Liu, C. Y., & Andersen, R. A. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2460-20.2021 · Cited by 27
“PMv neurons respond to tactile and proprioceptive somatosensory stimuli (Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano et al., 1997; Graziano, 1999).”
BackgroundRepresentation of Bodily Self in the Multimodal Parieto-Premotor Network
Murata, A., & Ishida, H. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-73021-7_6 · Cited by 30
Leveraging Nonhuman Primate Multisensory Neurons and Circuits in Assessing Consciousness Theory
Noel, J.-P., Ishizawa, Y., Patel, S. R., Eskandar, E. N., & Wallace, M. T. (2019) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0934-19.2019 · Cited by 30
“These results 642 comport well with the known multisensory convergence in vPM [58, 59], but also represent the first evidence 643 that these neurons can integrate this information.”
Action Shapes the Sense of Body Ownership Across Human Development
Nava, E., Gamberini, C., Berardis, A., & Bolognini, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02507 · Cited by 26
“…revealed that activity in the premotor cortex (Ehrsson et al., 2004, 2005; Convento et al., 2018) is associated with feelings of owning the rubber hand, and that neurons in the ventral premotor cortex react to multisensory stimuli that guide action (Graziano et al., 1994; Fogassi et al., 1996).”
BackgroundGrasping and Manipulation: Neural Bases and Anatomical Circuitry in Humans
Errante, A., Ziccarelli, S., Mingolla, G. P., & Fogassi, L. (2021) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.01.028 · Cited by 32
Self-citationMental Activity & the Sense of Ownership
Alsmith, A. (2015) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-014-0208-1 · Cited by 28
Space Coding in Inferior Premotor Cortex (Area F4): Facts and Speculations
Fogassi, L., D, V. G. M., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2403-6_4 · Cited by 27
Self-citationA behavioral approach to shared mapping of peripersonal space between oneself and others
Teramoto, W. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23815-3 · Cited by 26
Maselli, A. (2015) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-015-0667-z · Cited by 28
“These multisensory populations establish a somatosensory connection to visual stimuli in the environment and are regarded as the main encoders of peripersonal space (Graziano and Gross 1993; Fogassi et al. 1996).”
BackgroundMultisensory correlations—Not tactile expectations—Determine the sense of body ownership
Guterstam, A., Larsson, D. E. O., Zeberg, H., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213265 · Cited by 24
Prefrontal and posterior parietal contributions to the perceptual awareness of touch
Rullmann, M., Preusser, S., & Pleger, B. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53637-w · Cited by 26
Zapetis, S. L., Nasiriavanaki, Z., Luther, L., & Holt, D. J. (2022) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbac052 · Cited by 27
Spatial dependency of action simulation
ter Horst, A. C., van Lier, R., & Steenbergen, B. (2011) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2748-2 · Cited by 27
“…Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands and neurally dissociateable from the EPS in both primates (Rizzolatti et al. 1981a, b; Fogassi et al. 1996, 1999; Graziano et al. 1994, 1997; Murata et al. 1997; Duhamel et al. 1998; Caggiano et al. 2009) and humans (di Pellegrino et…”
Filbrich, L., Alamia, A., Blandiaux, S., Burns, S., & Legrain, V. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182634 · Cited by 26
Garbarini, F., Cecchetti, L., Bruno, V., Mastropasqua, A., Fossataro, C., Massazza, G., Sacco, K., Valentini, M. C., Ricciardi, E., & Berti, A. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy134 · Cited by 25
Matelli, M., Luppino, G., Geyer, S., & Zilles, K. (2004) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012547626-3/50027-2 · Cited by 26
Self-citationBody ownership promotes visual awareness
van der Hoort, B., Reingardt, M., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.26022 · Cited by 24
“We speculate that this finding relates to movement close to a hand being a strong cue for stimulation in peripersonal space, a stimulus that activates visuotactile neuronal populations in the fronto-parietal association cortices (Brozzoli et al., 2011; Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano et al., 1997; Makin et al., 2007),…”
Backgroundde Vignemont, F. (2021) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.5840/jphil2021118413 · Cited by 25
The Role of Motor Learning in Spatial Adaptation near a Tool
Brown, L. E., Doole, R., & Malfait, N. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028999 · Cited by 24
A Bodily Take on Aesthetics: Performativity and Embodied Simulation
Gallese, V. (2019) · Perspectives in pragmatics, psychology & philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_9 · Cited by 27
Self-citationDonato, R., Pavan, A., & Campana, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566848 · Cited by 25
“…stream involved in the vision for action has been confirmed by various neuropsychological, neurophysiological, and human neuroimaging studies (Fogassi et al., 1992, 1996; Clower et al., 1996; Kawashima et al., 1996; Rizzolatti et al., 1996; Robertson et al., 1997; Karnath and Perenin, 2005;…”
BackgroundMotion behind occluder: Amodal perception and visual motion extrapolation
Battaglini, L., & Ghiani, A. (2021) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2021.1943094 · Cited by 27
The Empathic Body in Experimental Aesthetics – Embodied Simulation and Art
D, V. G. M. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-51299-4_7 · Cited by 25
Self-citationBehavioral and autonomic responses to real and digital reproductions of works of art
Siri, F. M., Ferroni, F., Ardizzi, M., Kolesnikova, A. Y., Beccaria, M., Rocci, B., Christov-Bakargiev, C., & Gallese, V. (2018) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.020 · Cited by 29
Self-citationTanabe, H. C., Katô, M., Miyauchi, S., Hayashi, S., & Yanagida, T. (2004) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.010 · Cited by 24
“The PMv receives abundant corticocortical projections from the parietal cortex [19,26,39], including the anterior intraparietal area (AIP) [34], through which visual and somatosensory information is provided.”
BackgroundRoncone, A., Hoffmann, M., Pattacini, U., et al. (2015) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2015.7353846 · Cited by 23
“mimic the visual body-part-centered receptive fields (RFs) of neurons that were observed in monkeys [9].”
BackgroundBrozzoli, C., Makin, T. R., Cardinali, L., Holmes, N. P., & Farnè, A. (2011) · Frontiers in neuroscience · doi:10.1201/b11092-29 · Cited by 23
Linking psychoanalysis with neuroscience: The concept of ego
Rizzolatti, G., Semi, A. A., & Fabbri‐Destro, M. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.003 · Cited by 26
Self-citationKurata, K. (2007) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00149.2007 · Cited by 23
Unilateral neglect and disambiguation of the Necker cube
Bisiach, E., Ricci, R., Lai, E., et al. (1999) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/122.1.131 · Cited by 23
“…the metrics of space representation are contingent upon the equilibrium emerging in a widespread neuronal network of space-coding neurons (such as those investigated by, for example, Graziano and Gross, 1994; Galletti et al., 1995; Fogassi et al., 1996) from a system of functional counterforts.”
BackgroundMental space maps into the future
Belardinelli, A., Lohmann, J., Farnè, A., & Butz, M. V. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.007 · Cited by 19
Cortico-spinal modularity in the parieto-frontal system: A new perspective on action control
Bufacchi, R. J., Battaglia-Mayer, A., Iannetti, G. D., & Caminiti, R. (2023) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102537 · Cited by 22
“…receptive fields of F4 and VIP neurons: they are primarily centered around the head and the face, although F4 also shows more receptive fields around the hands and upper limbs than VIP (Gentilucci et al., 1983; Colby et al., 1993; Graziano et al., 1994; Fogassi et al., 1996; Duhamel et al., 1998).”
InfluentialSkrzypulec, B. (2021) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2021.1980519 · Cited by 22
“In particular, multimodal neurons coding peripersonal space are activated by changes in the distance of objects from the body and their velocity (Fogassi et al., 1996; Holmes & Spence, 2004).”
BackgroundRenzi, C., Bruns, P., Heise, K.-F., Zimerman, M., Feldheim, J., Hummel, F. C., & Röder, B. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00362 · Cited by 20
Effector‐based attention systems
Perry, C. J., & Fallah, M. (2017) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13354 · Cited by 22
The mirror mechanism in the parietal lobe
Rizzolatti, G., & Rozzi, S. (2018) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63622-5.00028-0 · Cited by 24
Self-citationIs Science Compatible with Free Will?
Suárez, A., & Adams, P. J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5212-6 · Cited by 49
Impairments in Multisensory Integration after Stroke
der Stoep, N. V., der Stigchel, S. V., Engelen, R. C. V., Biesbroek, J. M., & Nijboer, T. C. W. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01389 · Cited by 23
Integration of predictions and afferent signals in body ownership
Chancel, M., Hasenack, B., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104722 · Cited by 18
Pain outside the body: defensive peripersonal space deformation in trigeminal neuralgia
Bufacchi, R. J., Sambo, C. F., Stefano, G. D., Cruccu, G., & Iannetti, G. D. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12466-5 · Cited by 21
Peripersonal space is diversely sensitive to a temporary vs permanent state of anxiety
Spaccasassi, C., & Maravita, A. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104133 · Cited by 20
Vos, J. D., & Pluth, E. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315714189 · Cited by 85
Contribution of reference frames for movement planning in peripersonal space representation
Ghafouri, M., & Lestienne, F. G. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0121-z · Cited by 21
“tation of space can be used to construct multiple frames of reference, each one related to a spatial location or a specific class of action, and these can be used by the motor system to code appropriate movements (Arbib 1991; Colby and Duhamel 1996; Fogassi et al. 1996; Ghafouri et al. 2002; Graziano et al. 1994; Rizz…”
BackgroundMultisensory Perception and the Coding of Space
der Stoep, N. V., Postma, A., & Nijboer, T. C. W. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801638-1.00004-5 · Cited by 23
“About 20 years ago, neurophysiologists observed neurons in the premotor cortex of the macaque monkey that respond to both visual and tactile stimulation (Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano & Gross, 1994; Graziano, Hu, & Gross, 1997).”
InfluentialHierarchical Organization Within the Ventral Premotor Cortex of the Macaque Monkey
Kurata, K. (2018) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.04.033 · Cited by 18
Time‐to‐contact perception in the brain
Baurès, R., Fourteau, M., Thébault, S., Gazard, C., Pasquio, L., Meneghini, G., Perrin, J., Rosito, M., Durand, J., & Roux, F. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.24740 · Cited by 22
“…& Schubö, 2014) to events localized in PPS. Seminal studies in non-human primate have shown that the ventral premotor cortex (vPMc), (e.g., Fogassi et al., 1996), and intraparietal sulcus, specifically in the ventral intraparietal area (VIP; e.g., Avillac et al., 2005), may be responsible…”
BackgroundSchizophrenia and the bodily self
Gallese, V., Ardizzi, M., & Ferroni, F. (2024) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2024.05.014 · Cited by 22
“…fronto-parietal network of the macaque brain, integrate tactile information on the body with visual (or auditory) stimuli occurring close to the body, i.e. within the PPS (Graziano and Cooke, 2006; Rizzolatti et al., 1981a, 1981b; Duhamel et al., 1998; Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano et al., 1994).”
Self-citationWang, X., Du, F., He, X., & Zhang, K. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0038140 · Cited by 20
Close to You: Embodied Simulation for Peripersonal Space in Primary Somatosensory Cortex
Schaefer, M., Heinze, H., & Rotte, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042308 · Cited by 19
Liang, M., Mouraux, A., Chan, V., Blakemore, C. B., & Iannetti, G. D. (2010) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.12.012 · Cited by 19
“…to both tactile and visual stimuli applied to the contralateral side of the body have been identified in the putamen, the parietal cortex and the inferior premotor cortex (Avillac et al., 2007; Duhamel et al., 1998; Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano and Gross, 1993; Graziano and Gross, 1995).”
Graziano, M. S. A., Alisharan, S. E., Hu, X., et al. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.172380399 · Cited by 20
De Paepe, A. L., Crombez, G., & Legrain, V. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.015 · Cited by 18
“Unlike studies in monkeys (Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano et al., 1997), studies investigating the mapping of nociceptive stimuli in a peripersonal frame of reference in humans have mainly focused on a representation of the peripersonal space of the whole body using the body’s main axes, such as the midsagittal plane,…”
InfluentialIntegrating Information From Vision and Touch: A Neural Network Modeling Study
Magosso, E. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/titb.2010.2040750 · Cited by 19
“The advantage of seeing the tactile stimulation on tactile feeling might be due to feedback projections from high-level multimodal areas (e.g., visual–tactile areas in the parietal cortex [3], [11], [12]) to more specialized unimodal areas (somatosensory areas in this case) [13], [14].”
BackgroundDimitri, D., Filippis, D. D., Galetto, V., & Zettin, M. (2017) · Neurocase · doi:10.1080/13554794.2017.1305112 · Cited by 19
“The visual receptive field would therefore represent a three-dimensional expansion of the cutaneous field (Fogassi et al., 1996).”
BackgroundA Neuroscientific Perspective on the Nature of Altered Self-Other Relationships in Schizophrenia
Ebisch, S. J. H., & Gallese, V. (2015) · Journal of Consciousness Studies · Cited by 19
Self-citationCuppini, C., Magosso, E., & Ursino, M. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00077 · Cited by 20
“The multimodal neurons may correspond to cells in the parietal and frontal cortex (observed via electrophysiological measures in animals; Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano et al., 1997, 1999, and via neuroimaging studies in humans; Bremmer et al., 2001; Makin et al., 2007) having visual, auditory, and…”
BackgroundHuman premotor cortex : beyond motor performance
Schubotz, R. I. (2004) · Max Planck Digital Library · Cited by 18
An embodied approach to fetal and newborn perceptual and sensorimotor development
Craighero, L. (2024) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106184 · Cited by 22
“A large proportion of them also respond to all possible sensory stimuli (tactile, visual, acoustic) present on the skin or close to the skin, in correspondence of a specific tactile receptive field (Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano et al., 1997, 1999; Rizzolatti et al., 1988).”
Matsuda, Y., Sugimoto, M., İnami, M., & Kitazaki, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90784-5 · Cited by 17
The Remapping of Peripersonal Space in a Real but Not in a Virtual Environment
Ferroni, F., Gallese, V., Soccini, A. M., Langiulli, N., Rastelli, F., Ferri, D., Bianchi, F. P., & Ardizzi, M. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12091125 · Cited by 19
Self-citationFunctional brain areas associated with manipulation of a prehensile tool: A PET study
Tsuda, H., Aoki, T., Oku, N., Kimura, Y., Hatazawa, J., & Kinoshita, H. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20715 · Cited by 18
“The visual and tactile receptive fields of these neurons are in the spatial register; that is, the visual receptive fields match the location of the tactile receptive fields on the body surface, and extend in depth to the space immediately surrounding the body [Fogassi et al., 1996].”
BackgroundSpatial limits of visuotactile interactions in the presence and absence of tactile stimulation
Mirams, L., Poliakoff, E., & Lloyd, D. M. (2017) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-017-4998-0 · Cited by 18
“…close, as opposed to far from the location of tactile stimulation (Spence et al. 2004b; Shore et al. 2006), perhaps due to the response properties of visuotactile neurons, which respond more strongly for visual stimuli positioned close to the body (e.g. Fogassi et al. 1996; Rizzolatti et al. 2002).”
Bertoni, T., Magosso, E., & Serino, A. (2020) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14981 · Cited by 20
“In order to establish a comparison with the neurophysiological literature, we then studied the subset of neurons in the multisensory layer that positively respond to touch, to compare our artificial neural population to the one typically studied in primates (Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano et al., 1994, 1997).”
ResultTestosterone administration in women increases the size of their peripersonal space
Masson, C. J., van der Westhuizen, D., Noel, J., Prévost, A., van Honk, J., Fotopoulou, A., Solms, M., & Serino, A. (2021) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-021-06080-1 · Cited by 22
Gregoriou, G. G., Luppino, G., Matelli, M., et al. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.038 · Cited by 18
“Our finding that F4 processes visual stimuli, regardless of execution of reaching movements towards them, is in agreement with previous studies reporting visual responses in F4 (Boussaoud et al., 1993; Fogassi et al., 1996a; Graziano et al., 1997).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationLi, W., & Matin, L. (2004) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.026 · Cited by 18
Spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face
Huang, R., Chen, C., & Sereno, M. I. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23995 · Cited by 17
“…McCollum, Klam, & Graf, 2012; Sereno & Huang, 2006); (4) precentral polysensory zone (PZ) and ventral premotor cortex (PMv) (Bremmer et al., 2001; Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano & Gandhi, 2000; Graziano, Yap, & Gross, 1994; Graziano, Hu, & Gross, 1997; Huang & Sereno, 2007, 2018); and (5) area…”
BackgroundMultimodal Encoding of Goal-Directed Actions in Monkey Ventral Premotor Grasping Neurons
Bruni, S., Giorgetti, V., Fogassi, L., & Bonini, L. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv246 · Cited by 17
“Second, PMv hosts bimodal neurons that respond to both tactile and visual (Rizzolatti et al. 1981b; Graziano et al. 1994; Fogassi et al. 1996; Guipponi et al. 2015) or tactile and auditory (Graziano et al. 1999) stimuli delivered within peripersonal space sectors linked with specific body parts…”
BackgroundSelf-citationSaccone, E. J., Szpak, A., Churches, O. F., & Nicholls, M. E. R. (2017) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-017-1413-7 · Cited by 14
“In fact, cognitive neuroscience has provided evidence that the brain uniquely represents this space by its potential for action and interaction with the physical world (Fogassi et al., 1996; Graziano & Gross, 1994; Rizzolatti, Fadiga, Fogassi, & Gallese, 1997).”
BackgroundSomervail, R., Bufacchi, R. J., Guo, Y., Kilintari, M., Novembre, G., Swapp, D., Steed, A. J., & Iannetti, G. D. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40075-x · Cited by 17
The spatial alignment effect in near and far space: a kinematic study
Stefani, E. D., Innocenti, A., Marco, D. D., et al. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-3943-8 · Cited by 17
“Previous neurophysiological studies in monkeys (Fogassi et al. 1996; Gentilucci et al. 1983, 1988; Graziano 2006) and humans (Jeannerod 1994; Johnson-Frey 2004) have attributed to inferior parietal lobule and premotor cortex the role of affordance instantiation on the basis of intrinsic (grasp) and extrinsic (reach) o…”
Result14C-Deoxyglucose mapping of the monkey brain during reaching to visual targets
Savaki, H. E., & Dalezios, Y. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00080-x · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Luppino, G., Matelli, M., & Rizzolatti, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Parma (IT)
- Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Universita di Parma, Italy.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1996-07-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-157
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1785556983
- Cited by
- 688
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 29.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- peripersonal space, eye position, visual receptive fields, bimodal neurons, stimulus velocity, neck muscle activity, spatial coding, monkeys
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Cues, Depth Perception, Environment, Fixation, Ocular, Macaca nemestrina, Motion Perception, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Retina, Robotics, Somatosensory Cortex, Visual Pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review