The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulation and Modulation of pH in the Brain
Abstract
Chesler, Mitchell. Regulation and Modulation of pH in the Brain. Physiol Rev 83: 1183-1221, 2003; 10.1152/physrev.00010.2003.—The regulation of pH is a vital homeostatic function shared by all tissues. Mechanisms that govern H+in the intracellular and extracellular fluid are especially important in the brain, because electrical activity can elicit rapid pH changes in both compartments. These acid-base transients may in turn influence neural activity by affecting a variety of ion channels. The mechanisms responsible for the regulation of intracellular pH in brain are similar to those of other tissues and are comprised principally of forms of Na+/H+exchange, Na+-driven Cl-/HCO 3-exchange, Na+-HCO 3-cotransport, and passive Cl-/HCO 3-exchange. Differences in the expression or efficacy of these mechanisms have been noted among the functionally and morphologically diverse neurons and glial cells that have been studied. Molecular identification of transporter isoforms has revealed heterogeneity among brain regions and cell types. Neural activity gives rise to an assortment of extracellular and intracellular pH shifts that originate from a variety of mechanisms. Intracellular pH shifts in neurons and glia have been linked to Ca 2+transport, activation of acid extrusion systems, and the accumulation of metabolic products. Extracellular pH shifts can occur within milliseconds of neural activity, arise from an assortment of mechanisms, and are governed by the activity of extracellular carbonic anhydrase. The functional significance of these compartmental, activity-dependent pH shifts is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dietzel, I., Heinemann, U., Hofmeier, G., & Lux, H. D. (1980) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00236151 · Cited by 357
Numata, M., & Orlowski, J. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m101319200 · Cited by 244
Cited by
Verkhratsky, A., & Nedergaard, M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00042.2016 · Cited by 1,678
ELECTRICAL SYNAPSES IN THE MAMMALIAN BRAIN
Connors, B. W., & Long, M. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131128 · Cited by 784
Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels
Hansen, K. B., Wollmuth, L. P., Bowie, D., Furukawa, H., Menniti, F. S., Sobolevsky, A. I., Swanson, G. T., Swanger, S. A., Greger, I. H., Nakagawa, T., et al. (2021) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pharmrev.120.000131 · Cited by 686
Structure, function, and allosteric modulation of NMDA receptors
Hansen, K. B., Yi, F., Perszyk, R. E., Furukawa, H., Wollmuth, L. P., Gibb, A. J., & Traynelis, S. F. (2018) · Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.201812032 · Cited by 573
The diverse functional roles and regulation of neuronal gap junctions in the retina
Bloomfield, S. A., & Völgyi, B. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2636 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- CHESLER, M.
- Venue
- Physiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1183-1221
- ISSN
- 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1210
- OpenAlex
- W2130630814
- Cited by
- 883
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulation and Modulation of pH in the Brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/physrev.00010.2003
- The paper
- CHESLER, M. (2003). Regulation and Modulation of pH in the Brain. Physiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00010.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.