The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Load-Regulating Mechanisms in Gait and Posture: Comparative Aspects
Abstract
How is load sensed by receptors, and how is this sensory information used to guide locomotion? Many insights in this domain have evolved from comparative studies since it has been realized that basic principles concerning load sensing and regulation can be found in a wide variety of animals, both vertebrate and invertebrate. Feedback about load is not only derived from specific load receptors but also from other types of receptors that previously were thought to have other functions. In the central nervous system of many species, a convergence is found between specific and nonspecific load receptors. Furthermore, feedback from load receptors onto central circuits involved in the generation of rhythmic locomotor output is commonly found. During the stance phase, afferent activity from various load detectors can activate the extensor part in such circuits, thereby providing reinforcing force feedback. At the same time, the flexion is suppressed. The functional role of this arrangement is that activity in antigravity muscles is promoted while the onset of the next flexion is delayed as long as the limb is loaded. This type of reinforcing force feedback is present during gait but absent in the immoble resting animal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Movement, posture and equilibrium: Interaction and coordination
Massion, J. (1992) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(92)90034-c · Cited by 1,647
Johansson, R. S., & Westling, G. (1987) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00236210 · Cited by 865
Massion, J. (1994) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90137-6 · Cited by 747
A neuronal mechanism for sensory gating during locomotion in a vertebrate
Sillar, K. T., & Roberts, A. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/331262a0 · Cited by 121
Drew, T. (1991) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1991.66.3.919 · Cited by 96
Graham, D. (1979) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00337390 · Cited by 69
Cited by
How animals move: an integrative view
Dickinson, M. H., Farley, C. T., Full, R. J., Koehl, M. A. R., Kram, R., & Lehman, S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5463.100 · Cited by 1,633
Dynamic Sensorimotor Interactions in Locomotion
Rossignol, S., Dubuc, R., & Gossard, J.-P. (2006) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2005 · Cited by 1,096
Intermanual coordination: From behavioural principles to neural-network interactions
Swinnen, S. P. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn807 · Cited by 788
Current principles of motor control, with special reference to vertebrate locomotion
Grillner, S., & El Manira, A. (2020) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00015.2019 · Cited by 560
Regulation of Arm and Leg Movement during Human Locomotion
Zehr, E. P., & Duysens, J. (2004) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858404264680 · Cited by 409
Self-citationMayr, A., Kofler, M., Quirbach, E., Matzak, H., Fröhlich, K., & Saltuari, L. (2007) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968307300697 · Cited by 371
Speed dependence of averaged EMG profiles in walking
Hof, A. L., Elzinga, H., Grimmius, W., & Halbertsma, J. P. K. (2002) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00206-5 · Cited by 313
The effect of changes in foot sensation on plantar pressure and muscle activity
Nurse, M. A., & Nigg, B. M. (2001) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00090-0 · Cited by 305
Ivanenko, Y. P., Grasso, R., Macellari, V., & Lacquaniti, F. (2002) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2002.87.6.3070 · Cited by 266
Den Otter, A. R., Geurts, A. C. H., Mulder, T., & Duysens, J. (2006) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.014 · Cited by 177
Self-citationGal, R., & Libersat, F. (2006) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-006-0135-4 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Duysens, J., Clarac, F., & Cruse, H.
- Venue
- Physiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-133
- ISSN
- 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1210
- OpenAlex
- W1512811199
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
