The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adults
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Complicated urinary tract infection occurs in individuals with functional or structural abnormalities of the genitourinary tract.OBJECTIVE: To review current knowledge relevant to complicated urinary tract infection, and to provide evidence‐based recommendations for management.METHODS: The literature was reviewed through a PubMed search, and additional articles were identified by journal reference review. A draft guideline was prepared and critically reviewed by members of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada Guidelines Committee, with modifications incorporated following the review.RESULTS: Many urological abnormalities may be associated with complicated urinary infection. There is a wide spectrum of potential infecting organisms, and isolated bacteria tend to be more resistant to antimicrobial therapy. Morbidity and infection outcomes in subjects with complicated urinary infection are principally determined by the underlying abnormality rather than the infection. Principles of management include uniform collection of a urine specimen for culture before antimicrobial therapy, characterization of the underlying genitourinary abnormality, and nontreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria except before an invasive genitourinary procedure. The antimicrobial regimen is determined by clinical presentation, patient tolerance, renal function and known or anticipated infecting organisms. If the underlying abnormality contributing to the urinary infection cannot be corrected, then early post‐treatment recurrence of infection is anticipated.CONCLUSIONS: The management of complicated urinary infection is individualized depending on patient variables and the infecting organism. Further clinical investigations are necessary to assist in determining optimal antimicrobial regimens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Prospective Multicenter Surveillance Study of Funguria in Hospitalized Patients
Kauffman, C. A., Vazquez, J. A., Sobel, J. D., Gallis, H. A., McKinsey, D. S., Karchmer, A. W., Sugar, A. M., Sharkey, P. K., Wise, G. J., Mangi, R., et al. (2000) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/313583 · Cited by 483
Leu, H.-S., & Huang, C.-T. (1995) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/20.5.1152 · Cited by 93
Cited by
Asafo-Adjei, K., Mensah, J. E., Labi, A.-K., Dayie, N. T. K. D., & Donkor, E. S. (2018) · Diseases · doi:10.3390/diseases6030065 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicolle, L.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 349-360
- ISSN
- 1180-2332 (ISSN-L)
- 1712-9532
- 1918-1493
- OpenAlex
- W1518048238
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2005/385768
- The paper
- Nicolle, L. (2005). Complicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adults. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1155/2005/385768
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.