The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomarkers in Cervical Cancer Screening
Open accessAbstract
In industrialized countries, population wide cytological screening programs using the Pap test have led to a substantial reduction of the incidence of cervical cancer. Despite this evident success, screening programs that rely on Pap‐stained cytological samples have several limitations. First, a number of equivocal or mildly abnormal test results require costly work up by either repeated retesting or direct colposcopy and biopsy, since a certain percentage of high grade lesions that require immediate treatment hide among these unclear test results. This work up of mildly abnormal or equivocal cytological tests consumes a large amount of the overall costs spent for cervical cancer screening. Improved triage of these samples might substantially reduce the costs. Cervical cancer is induced by persistent infections with oncogenic human papilloma viruses (HPV). While HPV infection is an indispensable factor, it is not sufficient to cause cancer. The majority of acute HPV infections induce low grade precursor lesions that are cleared spontaneously after several months in more than 90% of cases, and less than 10% eventually progress to high grade lesions or invasive cancer. Progression is characterized by the deregulated expression of the viral oncogenes E6 and E7 in infected basal and parabasal cells. Novel biomarkers that allow monitoring these essential molecular events in histological or cytological specimens are likely to improve the detection of lesions that have a high risk of progression in both primary screening and triage settings. In this review, we will discuss potential biomarkers for cervical cancer screening with a focus on the level of clinical evidence that supports their application as novel markers in refined cervical cancer screening programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The 2001 Bethesda System<SUBTITLE>Terminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology</SUBTITLE>
Solomon, D. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2114 · Cited by 3,104
Reversal of human cellular senescence: roles of the p53 and p16 pathways
Beauséjour, C. M., Krtolica, A., Galimi, F., Narita, M., Lowe, S. W., Yaswen, P., & Campisi, J. (2003) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg417 · Cited by 1,457
Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study
Cuzick, J., Szarewski, A., Cubie, H., Hulman, G., Kitchener, H., Luesley, D., McGoogan, E., Menon, U., Terry, G., Edwards, R., et al. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14955-0 · Cited by 510
Cited by
Human Papillomavirus Testing in the Prevention of Cervical Cancer
Schiffman, M., Wentzensen, N., Wacholder, S., Kinney, W., Gage, J. C., & Castle, P. E. (2011) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djq562 · Cited by 759
Self-citationClinical implications of (epi)genetic changes in HPV-induced cervical precancerous lesions
Steenbergen, R. D. M., Snijders, P. J. F., Heideman, D. A. M., & Meijer, C. J. L. M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3728 · Cited by 386
Human Papillomavirus Infection and the Multistage Carcinogenesis of Cervical Cancer
Schiffman, M., & Wentzensen, N. (2013) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-1406 · Cited by 324
Self-citationTsoumpou, I., Arbyn, M., Kyrgiou, M., Wentzensen, N., Koliopoulos, G., Martin-Hirsch, P., Malamou-Mitsi, V., & Paraskevaidis, E. (2009) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.10.005 · Cited by 323
Self-citationden Boon, J. A., Pyeon, D., Wang, S. S., Horswill, M., Schiffman, M., Sherman, M., Zuna, R. E., Wang, Z., Hewitt, S. M., Pearson, R., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1509322112 · Cited by 291
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wentzensen, N., & von Knebel Doeberitz, M.
- Venue
- Disease Markers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 315-330
- ISSN
- 0278-0240 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8630
- OpenAlex
- W2108787642
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomarkers in Cervical Cancer Screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2007/678793
- The paper
- Wentzensen, N., & von Knebel Doeberitz, M. (2007). Biomarkers in Cervical Cancer Screening. Disease Markers. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/678793
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.